A hands-on guide to tracking experiments, logging models, and reproducing results with ML Flow. The post Are Your ML Experiments a Mess?
How a single evaluation choice inflated my results by 25 points, and what rebuilding honestly taught me about ML systems people might depend on The post My Fall-Detection Model Scored 94%, and It Was Lying to Me appeared first on Towards Data Science .
The article explains how the five core assumptions of MLOps monitoring are violated when agents are deployed to production, leading to inherited signals that incorrectly mark failed runs as healthy. It highlights the specific ways in which agent-based systems disrupt traditional monitoring stacks and the implications for reliability and performance. The piece serves as a warning for practitioners transitioning from MLOps to AgentOps, outlining the critical monitoring gaps that arise.
Patience, Optimism, Discipline, Projects, Teams The post Lessons Learned After 8. 5 Years of ML appeared first on Towards Data Science .
A reproducible 100-step LoRA fine-tuning run for OpenVLA, with dataset checks, Colab setup, training metrics, and W&B evidence. The post I Tried Fine-Tuning a Robot AI Model on Colab.
The article "How to Fine-Tune an LLM: An End-to-End Guide" offers a practical, hands‑on walkthrough for fine‑tuning large language models in real‑world scenarios. It covers the entire process from data preparation to deployment, providing readers with actionable steps to adapt LLMs to specific tasks. The guide is aimed at practitioners looking to implement fine‑tuning in a structured, end‑to‑end manner.
A practical tutorial for recording model tool requests, real function results, patches, checks, screenshots, and a saved run log. The post How to Debug AI Coding Agents When They Change the Wrong Thing appeared first on Towards Data Science .
You "vibe coded" the import. Understand Adam's optimization dynamics, why it fails spectacularly, and how to fix it.
The article reports that on a set of 100 randomly selected tasks from an internal Binary Exploitation benchmark, GLM‑5.3 achieved full control‑flow hijacks in 4% of the trials, while Claude Mythos Preview did so in 6%. Both models outperform earlier versions such as Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM‑5.2, which succeeded in none of the trials. This indicates that a significant threshold in adversarial exploitation capabilities has been crossed by the newer models.
How to smash through data / ML behavioural interviews The post How to Ace Data and ML Behavioural Interviews appeared first on Towards Data Science .
The article discusses how the reliability mechanisms added to large language model (LLM) pipelines can lead to confident but incorrect outputs, especially when the correct answer is absent. It examines the behavior of pipelines in such scenarios and highlights the paradox where safeguards intended to improve accuracy may actually reinforce errors. The piece underscores the importance of understanding pipeline responses when faced with missing or ambiguous information.
The article discusses insights gained from a deeper examination of Structured Outputs when dealing with messy, incomplete data. It highlights that even when a large language model returns perfectly formatted JSON, the content can still be incorrect. The author reflects on the implications of this observation for data science practices.
The article describes how to deploy a trained churn classifier as a FastAPI service so that other software can call it. It focuses on the practical steps needed to transform a model that performs well in isolation into a usable, callable API. The post is aimed at readers who want to make their machine‑learning models accessible in real-world applications.