arXiv:2607. 24354v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic prompt optimization (APO) has been widely adopted to adapt vision-language models (VLMs) to downstream tasks without weight updates, yielding promising results.
arXiv:2606. 20244v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) often underperform on evidence intensive tasks because decisive visual evidence are small, localized, and easy to overlook, leading to failures in evidence readout even when high-level reasoning is intact.
arXiv:2604. 14888v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in vision language models (VLMs) offer reasoning capabilities, yet how these unfold and integrate visual and textual information remains unclear.
arXiv:2607. 16311v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) often answer visual questions using learned language and category priors rather than grounding their predictions in the image itself.
arXiv:2608.29374v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-augmented multimodal reasoning integrates external tools (e.g., object detection, depth estimation) into multimodal large language models (MLLMs)...
arXiv:2607. 09544v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite strong performance on many multimodal tasks, vision-language models (VLMs) still struggle with basic object counting.
arXiv:2608. 07435v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are improving rapidly, but benchmark development lags behind, making weaknesses hard to identify.
arXiv:2608.29431v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Localized Representation Steering (LRS) is widely used to correct reasoning pathologies in large language models. However, standard benchmark evaluatio...
FPCO-Dialog is a new benchmark designed to evaluate how vision‑language models correct and cooperate when faced with repeated false premises in multi‑turn dialogues. The dataset contains 1,080 images and 10,800 question turns, organized by visual complexity, object category, and false‑premise class, and follows a 10‑turn protocol where a correct dialogue prefix is followed by repeated false‑premise expressions. Using a model‑agnostic protocol and the CorrTP@K correction‑rate metric, the benchmark reveals significant differences among 20 commercial and open‑source VLMs in their correction tendencies, turn‑wise dynamics, and responses to different false‑premise types.
arXiv:2607. 02089v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse multimodal tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to unreliable reasoning.
LOC I (Locator‑Critic) is a training‑free framework that separates visual search from evidence verification in Vision‑Language Models. It uses a Locator agent to propose candidate visual evidence and a Critic agent to assess its relevance, engaging in an iterative refinement loop that progressively improves the evidence until it is sufficient to answer a question. The approach yields state‑of‑the‑art results on several complex visual benchmarks, boosting accuracy for both open‑weight models like Qwen3‑VL and proprietary models such as Gemini 2.5 Pro.
arXiv:2603. 23867v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been applied to a wide range of reasoning tasks, yet it remains unclear whether they can reason robustly under distribution shifts.