arXiv:2301. 06308v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) is a training method that seeks to find flat minima in deep learning, resulting in state-of-the-art performance across various domains.
By Hoki Kim, Jinseong Park, Yujin Choi, Jaewook Lee
arXiv:2608.24568v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Deep neural networks generalize well despite their highly nonconvex, overparameterized loss landscapes, a phenomenon often associated with the geomet...
By Paul Caillon, Christophe Cerisara, Alexandre Allauzen
arXiv:2607. 06151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generalization remains a pivotal challenge in deep learning, where traditional optimizers like Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) often converge to sharp minima, leading to overfitting and reduced performance on unseen data.
By Yao Fu, Chunxia Zhang, Junmin Liu, Yihang Jin, Haishan Ye, Yuanao Yang
arXiv:2607. 18306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) improves generalization by minimizing the worst-case loss in a local parameter neighborhood.
By Zhen Huang, Jiaxin Deng, Junbiao Pang
arXiv:2606. 00442v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many machine learning techniques rely on approximating a loss function's curvature, but this is notoriously hard to do at the scale of modern deep networks.
By Artem Artemev, Rui Xia, Benjamin M. Boyd, Youjing Yu, Felix Dangel, Guillaume Hennequin, Alberto Bernacchia
The paper introduces Sparsity-Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SA‑SAM), a method that adjusts the perturbation radius in sharpness-aware training to remain consistent as model sparsity increases. It also evaluates a Magnitude‑Weighted Hessian (MWH) importance metric derived from second‑order analysis. Experiments on CIFAR‑10‑C, CIFAR‑100‑C, and ImageNet‑100‑C show that SA‑SAM improves corruption robustness at 80–90% sparsity while maintaining clean accuracy, and the study reports inference throughput at deployment‑relevant sparsity levels.
By Shiryu Ueno, Yoshikazu Hayashi, Kunihito Kato
arXiv:2409.09984v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) algorithm and its variants, including gap guided SAM (GSAM), have been successful at improving the generaliz...
By Hinata Harada, Hideaki Iiduka
arXiv:2605. 29547v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning optimization relies heavily on the assumption of smooth loss landscapes, a condition systematically violated by modern architectures due to non-smooth components such as ReLU activations and quantization operators.
By Ruoran Xu, Borong She, Xiaobo Jin, Qiufeng Wang
arXiv:2406. 14340v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method, as well as adaptive methods such as the Adam optimizer fail to converge if the learning rates do not converge to zero (particularly, in the situation of constant learning rates).
By Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen, Adrian Riekert
arXiv:2402.11215v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The choice of batch size in minibatch stochastic gradient optimization is critical for both optimization and generalization performance in large-sc...
By Tim Tsz-Kit Lau, Han Liu, Mladen Kolar
arXiv:2608. 03197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) improves generalization by seeking parameters whose loss is robust to local adversarial perturbations, but the quantitative mechanism underlying its implicit bias toward flat minima remains unclear.
By Jiaxin Deng, Junbiao Pang
arXiv:2601. 10962v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is central to deep learning, yet the dynamical origin of its preference for flatter, more generalizable solutions remains unclear.
By Ning Yang, Yikuan Zhang, Qi Ouyang, Chao Tang, Yuhai Tu