arXiv:2601. 17130v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used for tasks such as node classification and link prediction, but their use in sensitive settings raises concerns about training-data leakage.
arXiv:2606. 04069v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing privacy analyses for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) largely inherit assumptions from non-graph settings, overlooking structural correlations and stochastic training-graph sampling.
arXiv:2607. 08659v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown considerable success in learning from graph-structured data, but their use in privacy-sensitive areas remains difficult because graph structure can leak sensitive link information.
arXiv:2311.16139v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become indispensable tools for learning from graph structured data, catering to various applications such a...
The paper presents an empirical audit of privacy leakage in edge‑private graph generators by testing whether outputs from edge‑neighbouring inputs remain distinguishable. It introduces statistically valid lower bounds on privacy loss and compares direct‑edge, local‑structural, and GNN‑based attacks based on the geometry around a target edge. Experiments on two generators and two networks reveal that privacy leakage varies with both the mechanism and the network, and that learned representations expose information beyond conventional local statistics.
arXiv:2608. 04255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph inference over relational data can expose sensitive edge information, and this risk becomes more severe in dynamic graphs, where repeated model updates cause privacy loss to accumulate.
The paper evaluates privacy risks in graph neural networks enhanced by large language models (LLMs). Using a five‑stage framework, the authors test six real‑world text‑attributed graph datasets with 42 model configurations and six privacy attack methods across link, label, and membership inference threats. Results show that LLM‑enhanced GNNs are more vulnerable than shallow baselines, with semantic enrichment amplifying exploitable signals, and that differential privacy can reduce risk but at a significant cost to utility.
arXiv:2609.37667v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactual explanations for graph neural networks (GNNs) find the minimal intervention that flips a node's prediction--but computing one requires r...
arXiv:2606. 08067v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely deployed on relational data, yet they can leak sensitive or proprietary information about the training graph adjacency, e.
arXiv:2606. 29748v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The application of graph data in numerous disciplines raises the need for gathering and analyzing huge volumes of data, some of which is private and sensitive.
Graph Machine Learning as a Service platforms now offer explainability interfaces to satisfy regulatory transparency, but this transparency can be exploited. The paper introduces a novel model extraction attack for graph classification that operates under strict black‑box constraints, using only discrete class labels and binary explanation masks. The method guides Monte Carlo edge sensitivity estimation toward decision boundaries with Hoeffding guarantees and narrows the search space using explanation subgraphs, outperforming comparable baselines on benchmark datasets.
arXiv:2511.10936v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph unlearning (GU) has emerged as a promising solution to comply with "the right to be forgotten" regulations by enabling the removal of s...
arXiv:2608. 11495v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) serve as the backbone for high-stakes applications in Machine-Learning-as-a-Service (MLaaS).