arXiv Machine Learning

MAGE: Understanding Stability-Performance Trade-offs in Multi-component Prompt Optimization

arXiv:2607. 11944v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How do different components of iterative prompt optimization interact, and what happens when they are combined?

arXiv AI
Sep 4

ESPO: Error-Structured Prompt Optimization via Diagnose, Diversify, and Stabilize

ESPO (Error-Structured Prompt Optimization) addresses prompt bloat in evolutionary prompt optimizers by splitting the optimization process into Diagnose, Propose, and Select phases. It clusters training errors into structural patterns, generates diverse candidate prompts through four complementary strategies, and applies bootstrap stability selection. Across seven NLP benchmarks, ESPO improves average accuracy by +3.76 pp over GEPA, produces prompts 47 % shorter, and achieves higher accuracy on four additional student models, with the largest gain on Qwen3 GSM8K.

By Lihao Liu, Peng Tang, Kunwar Yashraj Singh, Shabnam Ghadar
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 3

ESPO: Error-Structured Prompt Optimization via Diagnose, Diversify, and Stabilize

ESPO (Error-Structured Prompt Optimization) addresses prompt bloat in evolutionary prompt optimizers by separating optimization into Diagnose, Propose, and Select phases. It clusters training errors, generates diverse candidates, and applies bootstrap stability selection, achieving a 3.76‑point accuracy gain over GEPA on seven NLP benchmarks while producing 47% shorter prompts. Cross‑model tests on four additional student models confirm ESPO’s superior average accuracy, notably improving Qwen3 GSM8K from 15.00% to 91.40%.

arXiv AI
Jun 29

When Is an LLM Worth It for Hyperparameter Optimization? A Budget-Matched Study on Tabular Data Finds the Warm-Start Is a Default Configuration, Not the Model

arXiv:2606. 21641v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as hyperparameter-optimization (HPO) advisors that "warm-start" search from prior knowledge, proposing strong configurations in very few evaluations.

By Carson Rodrigues, Oysturn Vas, Isaiah Abner DCosta, Nithish Kumar Prabhakaran
arXiv AI
Oct 26

RSI-Opt: Recursive Self-Improvement Optimizer Agents For Model Training

RSI-Opt introduces Recursive Self-Improvement Optimizer Agents that evolve their own training policies by accumulating knowledge from previous runs, including prompts, playbooks, optimizer code, and decision cadences. A meta‑agent rewrites and archives these policies, enabling reusable procedures and code that adapt to new tasks. Across multiple generations and tasks, RSI‑Opt improves optimizer performance, achieving higher z‑scores on evolution suites, better cross‑model transfer, and significant error reductions on PDE benchmarks compared to fixed‑prompt baselines.

By Binghang Lu, Yige Sun, Guang Lin
arXiv AI
Oct 9

How Should a Prompt Optimizer Spend a Tight Budget? BudgetAPO with Noise-Adaptive Evaluation

The paper introduces BudgetAPO, a single‑stage prompt optimizer designed for tight‑budget scenarios where only a few hundred model calls are feasible. BudgetAPO adapts the evaluation slice size to each task’s noise level, uses a fixed slice to turn accept/reject decisions into paired comparisons, and applies a reflective operator to jointly rewrite reasoning strategy and output format. Across seven benchmarks and five subject models, BudgetAPO outperforms existing methods, ranking first on every subject and requiring far fewer calls to achieve comparable or superior performance.

By Haoyue Liu, Zhichao Wang, Huanyu Yan, Xiaoying Tang
arXiv AI
Oct 12

Meta-Reflective Evolution Effectively Improves Production AI Systems

Meta-Reflective Evolution Effectively Improves Production AI Systems describes CoCoEvolve, an evolutionary optimizer that uses meta-reflection to retrieve evidence from the entire evolutionary history and probe live systems before proposing mutations. The approach is applied to data agents, LLM-powered data pipelines, and data engineering workflows, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on DABStep, multiple LLM pipeline workloads, and data-eng-bench. Ablation studies confirm that each component of CoCoEvolve contributes to its performance gains.

By Seung Won Wilson Yoo, Chang Zeng, Aditi Somayajula, Sahithi Ankireddy, Rohan Kosalge, Avishree Khare, John Mitchell, Aditya G. Parameswaran, Rajhans Samdani, Anupam Datta
arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago

Lineage Is Memory: Parent Inheritance and Feedback Disclosure in Short-Budget LLM-Guided Optimization

The paper investigates how iterative language‑model optimizers improve prompts and programs by evaluating candidates, exposing failing cases to a proposer model, and retaining revisions that enhance performance. By conducting 1,750 pre‑registered experiments across nine benchmarks, the authors disentangle the effects of parent inheritance (keeping a surviving parent) from feedback disclosure (providing failure summaries) under equal computational budgets. They find that greedy parent inheritance alone drives most optimization gains, outperforming seed‑reset strategies even when the latter receive comprehensive failure summaries or larger proposer models, and that the cost of proposer reflection is minimal compared to validation and minibatch gating.

By Shanglin Yang, Zhan Shi