Instruction Stacking Collapse: A Benchmark and the Capability-Dependent Value of Prompt Compilation
arXiv:2608. 02639v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production prompts rarely carry a single instruction.
The paper investigates how iterative language‑model optimizers improve prompts and programs by evaluating candidates, exposing failing cases to a proposer model, and retaining revisions that enhance performance. By conducting 1,750 pre‑registered experiments across nine benchmarks, the authors disentangle the effects of parent inheritance (keeping a surviving parent) from feedback disclosure (providing failure summaries) under equal computational budgets. They find that greedy parent inheritance alone drives most optimization gains, outperforming seed‑reset strategies even when the latter receive comprehensive failure summaries or larger proposer models, and that the cost of proposer reflection is minimal compared to validation and minibatch gating.
arXiv:2608. 02639v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production prompts rarely carry a single instruction.
arXiv:2608. 08189v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-driven program discovery relies on rapid evaluator feedback, but many scientific and engineering tasks require high-fidelity simulations, hardware execution, or physical experiments, making each evaluation expensive.
The paper introduces a two‑stage framework for reflective prompt optimization that separates candidate generation from validation. In the construction stage, multiple parents are sampled and their training responses reused across parallel reflection branches, with each revision screened on a small minibatch to allow locally improved candidates to propagate without full validation. In the exploration stage, a fixed full‑validation budget is used to select the best prompt from a frozen candidate pool, enabling independent control of pool size and validation effort. Experiments on five benchmarks with Qwen3.5‑9B and Llama‑3.1‑8B‑Instruct show that retaining 100 candidates and performing 20 full validations can improve performance by up to 11.22 percentage points over the initial solver, and learned selection consistently outperforms the initial solver across all comparisons.
arXiv:2609.39927v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prompt optimization improves the performance of language-model systems on downstream tasks by refining their prompts. Classical methods evaluate prompt...
arXiv:2608. 04336v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Code generation systems make each LLM call with a model, a prompt, and decoding settings.
arXiv:2610.15708v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Coding agents based on frozen language models can improve their performance by refining the external context they rely on, without updating model weigh...
HGM-Dual is a diagnostic‑guided framework that improves harness optimization for planning agents by representing agent evolution as lineage‑aware context and using error‑conditioned dual‑path child generation. It records ancestor changes, behavior outcomes, and ineffective modifications, enabling explicit edit‑outcome attribution. The method achieves up to 14.45% relative improvement in case accuracy while using 2×–4× fewer evaluation budgets compared to the strongest baseline.
arXiv:2608. 09629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving agents are usually built around prescribed optimization pipelines: the framework decides how to gather evidence, revise a persistent artifact, select candidates, and stop.
arXiv:2607. 28947v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to solve complex problems by searching over program space, offering a general paradigm for scientific problems that can be naturally represented and solved as programs.
arXiv:2609.38639v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-guided evolutionary search can discover complex programs, but existing methods mostly only save candidate programs and fitness scores while discard...
The paper introduces BudgetAPO, a single‑stage prompt optimizer designed for tight‑budget scenarios where only a few hundred model calls are feasible. BudgetAPO adapts the evaluation slice size to each task’s noise level, uses a fixed slice to turn accept/reject decisions into paired comparisons, and applies a reflective operator to jointly rewrite reasoning strategy and output format. Across seven benchmarks and five subject models, BudgetAPO outperforms existing methods, ranking first on every subject and requiring far fewer calls to achieve comparable or superior performance.
arXiv:2604. 01029v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-LLM revision pipelines, in which a second model reviews and improves a draft produced by a first, are widely assumed to derive their gains from genuine error correction.