MemoryArena is a new evaluation gym that benchmarks agent memory in interdependent multi‑session tasks. Unlike prior benchmarks that test memorization or single‑session action in isolation, MemoryArena requires agents to acquire memory while interacting with the environment and then use that memory to guide future decisions across a range of tasks such as web navigation, planning, information search, and formal reasoning. The benchmark reveals that agents excelling on existing long‑context memory tests perform poorly here, highlighting a gap in current memory evaluation methods.
By Zexue He, Yu Wang, Churan Zhi, Yuanzhe Hu, Tzu-Ping Chen, Lang Yin, Ze Chen, Tong Arthur Wu, Siru Ouyang, Zihan Wang, Jiaxin Pei, Julian McAuley, Yejin Choi, Alex Pentland
AdaMem introduces adaptive memory policies that allow personalized agents to decide what information to write into long‑term memory based on user preferences for each interaction context. Each policy is updated from periodic feedback and controls subsequent memory writing, aiming to improve relevance and reduce unnecessary memory persistence. In experiments on AdaMem‑Bench, AdaMem raises QA accuracy from 80.0% to 84.35% while cutting persistent memory by 9.27%, though models still struggle to execute policies reliably.
By Xingyu Chen, Rui Wang, Zhaopeng Tu, Liefeng Bo
arXiv:2606. 16432v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: User instructions are often underspecified because humans rely on implicit assumptions about the surrounding environment.
By Lai Jiang, Cheng Qian, Zhenhailong Wang, Pan Lu, Heng Ji, Hao Peng
arXiv:2606.13174v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Interactive LLM agents increasingly work with users across tasks, yet remembering a previous correction does not ensure that the agent change...
By Yujun Zhou, Kehan Guo, Haomin Zhuang, Xiangqi Wang, Yue Huang, Zhenwen Liang, Pin-Yu Chen, Tian Gao, Nuno Moniz, Nitesh V. Chawla, Xiangliang Zhang
arXiv:2607. 12385v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A significant challenge in agentic AI is prospective memory: the ability to execute an intention at a specific future cue or state while other activities are ongoing.
By Genglin Liu, Saadia Gabriel
The paper evaluates the planning abilities of large language model (LLM) agents by comparing their performance against formal semantics defined in hidden PDDL models. Across five domains, four LLMs, six prompting strategies, and three agent architectures, the best setup solved 78% of solvable tasks offline but only 40% online, with limited recognition of unsolvable tasks and no clear benefit from more elaborate prompting. The study concludes that claims of LLM planning competence require validated action traces rather than end‑to‑end success rates.
By Oriol Miro-Lopez-Feliu, Oscar Mir\'o L\'opez-Feliu, Victor Gimenez-Abalos, Javier Vazquez-Salceda, Victor Carballo Araruna, Sergio Alvarez-Napagao
The paper introduces MemPABench, an interactive environment designed to evaluate how personal agents remember and act on user interaction preferences. The benchmark features long‑horizon tasks where agents must decide when to clarify, confirm, or act autonomously, using data from four simulated users who provided 99 sessions over four months and five preference changes each. Experiments across four memory systems and LLM backbones show that current memory approaches offer limited improvement in preference selection, with retrieval‑based methods performing no better than no memory and file‑based memory sometimes applying preferences in irrelevant contexts.
By Jialin Li, Zhenhao Chen, Hanjun Luo, Hanan Salam
arXiv:2606. 14571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A central role of personal-agent memory is to turn stored information and prior interactions into future-oriented assistance.
By Guanming Liu, Yuqi Ren, Hansu Gu, Peng Zhang, Weihang Wang, Jiahao Liu, Ning Gu, Tun Lu
The paper introduces the Multi-Session Personalized Tool Calling (MPT) benchmark, containing 4,695 instances across 459 multi‑session histories that test Preference Recall, Induction, and Transfer. It proposes PRefine, a test‑time memory method that refines a user’s latent preference via a generate‑verify‑refine loop. Experiments with five LLMs show that PRefine outperforms existing memory systems and even full‑history prompting on Preference Transfer, suggesting that personalized agents should encode behavior as preferences rather than merely storing past interactions.
By Yejin Yoon, Minseo Kim, Taeuk Kim
MemCo introduces a memory‑centric collaboration framework that equips large language model agents with both local and global memory spaces. Local memory preserves environment‑specific details, while global memory captures transferable workflows from local trajectories. During online interaction, MemCo selectively routes relevant memories based on the agent’s state and decision phase, enabling reuse of other agents’ experiences without over‑generalizing environment‑specific information.
By Xinting Liao, Siyan Liu, Rabab K. Ward, Holger R. Roth, Xiaoxiao Li
arXiv:2610.18052v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-term memory has become a core component of large language model (LLM) agents. As agents accumulate personal information over long-term use, users...
By Bofan Xie, Chaokun Wang, Guanchen Ge, Songyao Wang, Fang Niu, Hang Zhang, Wei Wang
arXiv:2607. 01071v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators.
By Zhishang Xiang, Zerui Chen, Yunbo Tang, Zhimin Wei, Ruqin Ning, Yujie Lin, Qinggang Zhang, Jinsong Su