Recent work in machine learning has demonstrated that transformer-based language model agents can communicate state not only through text, but also directly in latent space via key-value (KV) caches....
Latent Compaction is a test‑time training method that learns a compact, document‑specific key–value cache for large‑context language models. It initializes cache entries using reconstruction importance, teacher attention, and key‑space diversity, then fits attention outputs and log‑normalizers to the full cache before jointly optimizing the entire cache via end‑to‑end distillation. Experiments on RULER, LongBench, and Phonebook Lookup show significant accuracy gains over budget‑matched compression baselines, achieving 96.7% accuracy at 32× compression on RULER and transferring well across model scales and families.
By Yingfa Chen, Xingyu Shen, Chaojun Xiao, Xu Han
arXiv:2605. 22863v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM agents today communicate via text, which incurs considerable latency and information loss due to the need to autoregressively decode the sharer model's state and encode at the receiver model.
By Maximillian Rossi, Prajwal Raghunath, Eugene Wu
arXiv:2607. 16213v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) generate text autoregressively, relying on a key-value (KV) cache whose memory footprint grows linearly with context length, creating a major bottleneck.
By Soumia Bouyahiaoui, Manel Kara laouar, Aicha Boutorh, Mohamed Hadj Ameur
The paper introduces XKV, a latent protocol that enables efficient communication between heterogeneous language models by translating a sharer's key‑value cache into a receiver's context. XKV overcomes limitations of prior methods by jointly pooling both caches, reconciling differing layer depths, and allowing each receiver position to retrieve its own residual in native KV geometry. Across 45 dataset‑model pairings, XKV outperforms previous protocols and text communication while using fewer parameters and achieving faster translation times.
By Jiyao Liu, Qi Zhang, Yaoyi Jia, Ziwen Kan, Song Wang
arXiv:2602. 10238v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The growing size of Large Language Models (LLMs) makes efficient inference challenging, primarily due to the memory demands of the autoregressive Key-Value (KV) cache.
By Luca Moschella, Laura Manduchi, Ozan Sener
The paper introduces DEPT, a method that trains a single decoder-only large language model to both expand queries and encode documents for retrieval. By preserving document embeddings close to their initial cached values while allowing gradients to flow through the generator, DEPT stabilizes retrieval targets and enables efficient index reuse and online hard‑negative mining. Experiments on the BEIR benchmark with Qwen3‑4B‑Instruct‑2507 and LLaMA‑3.2‑3B‑Instruct show that DEPT outperforms training‑free, independently trained, and staged unified baselines, with ablations confirming the benefits of preservation, whitening, end‑to‑end expansion training, and online negatives.
By Jingyuan Wang, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie, Mingxin Li, Yanzhao Zhang
Long-context large language model (LLM) inference is increasingly constrained by the memory footprint and decoding cost of key-value (KV) caches, limiting sustainable deployment on resource-constrained hardware. Existing KV cache eviction methods typically apply heuristic token scoring over all heads in GQA-based LLMs.
arXiv:2606. 24467v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-context large language model (LLM) inference is increasingly constrained by the memory footprint and decoding cost of key-value (KV) caches, limiting sustainable deployment on resource-constrained hardware.
By Xiaolin Lin, Jingcun Wang, Olga Kondrateva, Yiyu Shi, Bing Li, Grace Li Zhang
arXiv:2608. 19662v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic language models repeatedly encode tool and skill schemas that recur across requests in different combinations and orders, preventing standard prefix caching from reusing their key--value (KV) states.
By Yichu Fang, Sitong Wei, Haozhe Hu, Xiaoyu Shen
The paper evaluates how robust large language models (LLMs) are when using retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) in practical settings. It investigates whether RAG always outperforms non‑RAG approaches, whether adding more retrieved documents helps, and whether the order of documents matters, using a benchmark of 1,891 samples across five datasets and three task categories. Experiments with 11 LLMs show generally high retrieval robustness, but performance varies by task and prompting strategy, indicating that adopting RAG should be considered on a case‑by‑case basis.
By Shuyang Cao, Karthik Radhakrishnan, David Rosenberg, Steven Lu, Pengxiang Cheng, Lu Wang, Shiyue Zhang
arXiv:2610.17338v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Language-model agents revise their working context as information becomes obsolete, but deleting text does not erase its influence on cached computatio...
By Han Yu, Wenhui Zhu, Jincheng Cao, Rui Cai, Yuanda Xu, Zhengze Zhou, Xiwen Chen, Hao Wang, Xuanzhao Dong, Han Shi, Menglin Zhou, Shayan Mohajer Hamidi, Lin Su, Mina Razghandi, Sayan Ghosh, Qing Lan, Rohit Jain, Alborz Geramifard