arXiv AI

Science Done on a Machine by a Machine: AI Agents in Computational Chemistry

The Perspective reviews the rapid growth of agentic AI systems in computational chemistry, noting an increase from a handful in 2024 to about fifty by August 2026. These systems are evolving from assisting with specific tasks to autonomously designing, executing, and analyzing in‑silico experiments, even drafting manuscripts. While fully autonomous AI scientists are not yet realized and human oversight remains, the trend toward commoditized generalist agents suggests a future where specialized systems may become obsolete, prompting reflection on the field’s direction and priorities.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

The convergent laboratory: when AI reasoning, autonomous experiments, high performance and quantum computing reshape chemistry

The article titled "The convergent laboratory: when AI reasoning, autonomous experiments, high performance and quantum computing reshape chemistry" discusses insights from the TPC26 conference, where leaders from academia, national laboratories, and industry examined how AI, autonomous agents, self-driving labs, high‑performance computing, and quantum computing converge to accelerate materials science discovery. It presents firsthand experiences from researchers at the forefront of these technologies and argues that their simultaneous maturation marks a tipping point for transformative advances and productive disruption in chemical sciences.

By Eliu Huerta, Xiaoyun Wang, Geetika Gupta, Edward H. Sargent, Cameron J. Owen, Victor Fung, Abhishek Mitra, Austin Cheng, Emma Bouchard, Shams Mehdi
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Agentic programs: an emerging form of scientific software in computational materials science

The article introduces the concept of agentic programs—scientific software that blends deterministic algorithms with bounded large‑language‑model (LLM) judgment, task‑specific verification, episodic maturation, and full delegation in production. It argues that recent LLM‑based agents enable this new form of computational materials science software. The authors illustrate the idea with DeMARS, an agentic program designed to build atomistic models from experimentally measured disordered crystal structures.

By Yunsung Lim, Haekwan Jeon, Jaesun Kim, Jisu Kim, Seungwu Han
arXiv AI
Aug 10

Strategy-first synthesis planning for complex natural products

arXiv:2608. 07454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The total synthesis of a complex molecule is among the most demanding intellectual and experimental feats in chemistry: a chemist must plan many steps ahead for how to assemble simple building blocks into an intricate target, devise backup strategies, and anticipate procedural challenges.

By Daniel Armstrong, Xuan-Vu Nguyen, Octavian Susanu, Gabriel Gibberd, Th\'eo A. Neukomm, Tadd\"aus Strunden, Dan Forster, Morgane Delattre, Shawn Teh, Cl\'ement Rols, John Federice, Hayden Leatherwood, M. Lavelle Barnes, Maarten R. Dobbelaere, Peter Wipf, Jon T. Njardarson, Jieping Zhu, Philippe Schwaller
arXiv AI
4d ago

El Agente Potente: High-Throughput Agentic Atomistic Simulations

El Agente Potente is an agentic system that integrates typed execution graphs and a coding mode to facilitate machine‑learning interatomic potential (MLIP) driven atomistic simulations. Typed execution graphs offer structured, provenance‑aware workflows where large language models handle planning and routing while deterministic Python code performs scientific computation and validation. The coding agent builds customized workflows for tasks needing procedural flexibility, invoking existing Potente functions for supported calculations. The system is demonstrated across materials discovery, energy‑landscape exploration, adsorption, and catalytic reaction workflows, with benchmarks on reproducibility and LLM token cost.

By Tsz Wai Ko, Jiaru Bai, Thomas Swanick, Yeonghun Kang, Changhyeok Choi, Angelina Qihong Jiang, Aiwei Yin, Varinia Bernales, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science?

The paper introduces AutoMat, a benchmark designed to test large language model (LLM) coding agents on their ability to reproduce claims from computational materials science. AutoMat presents three challenges: reconstructing underspecified procedures, navigating specialized toolchains, and assessing whether the evidence supports a claim. Experiments show that current LLM agents achieve low success rates, with the best setting reaching only 53%, and failures stem mainly from incomplete procedures, methodological deviations, and execution fragility.

By Ziyang Huang, Yi Cao, Ali K. Shargh, Jing Luo, Ruidong Mei, Mohd Zaki, Zhan Liu, Wyatt Bunstine, William Jurayj, Somdatta Goswami, Tyrel McQueen, Michael Shields, Jaafar El-Awady, Paulette Clancy, Benjamin Van Durme, Nicholas Andrews, William Walden, Daniel Khashabi
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 22

AI Scientists as Engines of Discovery: A Case for Development within Reformed Institutions

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are beginning to assist, accelerate, and partially automate scientific discovery, performing tasks that span literature synthesis, code generation, data analysis, hypothesis proposal, and model criticism. We argue that this transition is qualitative rather than incremental, and that suitably designed multi-agent systems may evolve from passive computational tools into ``AI scientists'' that can expand the hypothesis-generating and verification capacity of science.

arXiv AI
Aug 28

Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini in the Real-World

The paper extends Co‑Scientist, a Gemini‑based multi‑agent system, and validates it in real‑world scientific settings. In materials science it designed a safe precursor route for MXenes and achieved single‑attempt growth of monolayer MoS₂, MoSe₂, and WS₂. In biology it predicted swarming phenotypes of engineered E. coli, and in computer science it discovered a superior inference‑time scaling architecture for HealthBench. A double‑blind study with 30 experts showed that Co‑Scientist’s reliability modules reduce hallucination and plagiarism while improving research safety.

By Samuel Schmidgall, Xiaokai Zhu, Marian Shaw, Lin Yang, Valentin Li\'{e}vin, Jingyun Yang, Yuchen Zhuang, Tim Strother, Alex Bijamov, Min Woo Sun, Anil Palepu, Justin Chen, David Steiner, Jacqueline Shreibati, Wei-Hung Weng, Yilin Zhao, Xingjian Hu, Nicholas Zahn, Sadhya Garg, Julia Kirby, Yuxiang Gan, Jiaoli Li, Divy Thakkar, Shekoofeh Azizi, David Racz, Juraj Gottweis, Vivek Natarajan, Chenglin Wu, Tal Danino, Keran Rong, Haozhe Wang, Benoit Schillings, Yong Cheng, Quoc V. Le, Tao Tu