The paper proposes mechanisms for federated learning that both incentivize strategic data owners to contribute fully and learn a high‑quality model. The first mechanism, UPBReD, jointly updates client contributions and the model, converging to a Nash equilibrium that may involve under‑contribution. The second mechanism, 2P‑UPBReD, introduces budget‑balanced transfers to make full contribution a dominant strategy, ensuring convergence to the optimal model while guaranteeing that all clients prefer to participate. Subsequent extensions (T‑2P‑UPBReD) further enforce truthful reporting of contributions and gradients without running a deficit, and experiments on CIFAR‑10, FEMNIST, and Twitter demonstrate that 2P‑UPBReD achieves welfare comparable to FedAvg trained on all data.
By Drashthi Doshi, Avishek Ghosh, Swaprava Nath
arXiv:2607. 23029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without centralising their data, yet privacy remains a persistent concern because the shared model updates can leak information about local datasets.
By Kun Zhao, Xu Chen
The paper investigates the trade‑off between the costs of participating in federated learning (privacy, communication, compute) and the potential gains in model performance, framing this as a game‑theoretic problem of individual rationality versus autarky. It shows that clients can remain below their local‑training baseline for many rounds and that simply capping per‑round contributions harms learning. The authors propose a new mechanism that provides short‑term participation guarantees and personalized model evaluation, demonstrating theoretically and empirically that clients can avoid short‑term losses without significantly harming overall performance, even under moderate heterogeneity.
By Amin Meghrazi, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Andrew Perrault
The paper introduces a latent information sharing scheme for federated learning that mitigates client drift by sharing a small amount of hidden‑layer activations. The authors demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that this approach improves training efficiency while maintaining convergence guarantees and data privacy. Compared to existing methods such as FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedPVR, FedProto, and SplitFed, the proposed method achieves higher model accuracy within a fixed round budget without adding significant communication overhead.
By Seungjun Lee, Ensieh Khazaei, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, Baturalp Buyukates, Sunwoo Lee
arXiv:2606. 18384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL) enables scalable collaborative model training across distributed devices while preserving data privacy.
By Seyed Salar Ghazi, Kaiwen Zhang, Mehdi feizi, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
arXiv:2503. 07869v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Critical learning periods (CLPs) in federated learning (FL) refer to early stages during which low-quality contributions (e.
By Thanh Linh Nguyen, Dinh Thai Hoang, Diep N. Nguyen, Quoc-Viet Pham
The paper introduces a general learning framework that protects privacy in federated learning by distorting model parameters, enabling a trade‑off between privacy and utility. The algorithm supports arbitrary privacy measurements and delivers personalized utility‑privacy balances for each parameter, client, and communication round. The authors prove that the gap between their algorithm’s utility loss and the optimal loss is sub‑linear in iterations, provide a convergence rate, and demonstrate empirically that their method outperforms baselines under the same privacy budget.
By Xiaojin Zhang, Wenjie Li, Yiming Li, Wei Chen, Shutao Xia, Qiang Yang
arXiv:2607. 03171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Decentralised federated learning, based on peer-to-peer communication, is increasingly proposed for on-device training of machine learning models, promising a privacy-preserving, communication-efficient training process with no risk of single-point failure.
By Arash Badie-Modiri, Chiara Boldrini, Lorenzo Valerio, J\'anos Kert\'esz, M\'arton Karsai
Federated learning (FL) is a promising paradigm of machine learning, which preserves user privacy by enabling learning without sharing raw data with a cloud server. Straggling clients have been a prob...
arXiv:2608. 17849v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Split federated learning (SFL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for model training at the edge.
By Wei Wei, Xianhao Chen
arXiv:2608. 15153v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Differentially private federated learning must balance privacy protection against model accuracy and training efficiency.
By Wenjing Wei, Alla Jammine, Farid Nait-Abdesselam
arXiv:2608. 02250v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) is a popular distributed learning framework where multiple clients perform local training and a server aggregates the locally updated models.
By Yuan-Heng Tsai, Li-Hsing Yen, Yan-Wei Chen