CoMAP introduces a framework that jointly evolves textual world models and agent policies through a closed‑loop interaction. At each decision step the world model forecasts future state feedback for candidate actions, while the agent reflects on the reliability of this feedback to refine its action. The resulting on‑policy trajectories are used to self‑distill and update the world model, improving prediction accuracy and long‑horizon decision‑making across embodied planning, web navigation, and tool‑use benchmarks.
By Youwei Liu, Jian Wang, Hanlin Wang, Wenjie Li
arXiv:2606. 02372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Equipping language agents with world models enables them to anticipate environment dynamics and evaluate candidate actions before execution.
By Youwei Liu, Jian Wang, Hanlin Wang, Wenjie Li
Recent web agents use world models for test-time action selection by sampling candidate actions, predicting the resulting web states, and ranking them with a ranker model or a Process Reward Model (PR...
The paper introduces Discriminative World Models for Web Agents, proposing a predicted-state matching objective that trains world models to produce representations that can distinguish the true resulting state from those of alternative actions. Using a branching dataset from WebArena Go-Browse, the authors demonstrate that this approach outperforms traditional supervised next-state prediction on a held‑out benchmark and improves action ranking on WebPRMBench. Additionally, employing the discriminative world model for test‑time action selection boosts end‑to‑end task success on WebArena‑Lite.
By Kelvin Li, Dhruv Pendharkar, Anish Pahilajani, Chuyi Shang, Leon Oks, Leonid Karlinsky, Rogerio Feris, Trevor Darrell, Roei Herzig
arXiv:2606. 27136v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For LLM agents in multi-step interactive environments, a key challenge is to make effective use of accumulated interaction experience.
By Shicheng Ye, Chao Yu
arXiv:2607. 27973v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recently, Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for the post-training of Large Language Model (LLM) agents.
By Cong Li, Peixi Peng, Yisen Zhao, Xinyu Hu, Shudong Liu, Zhan Su, Zhuojian Li
arXiv:2608. 07107v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World models are increasingly used to support planning in agents by predicting how environment states evolve in response to agent actions.
By Yujun Wang, Tao Zhang, Jinhe Bi, Aniri, Wenxuan Ye, Boliang Liu, Sikuan Yan, Shuning Wang, Xuebing Zhou, S\"oren Pirk, Hinrich Sch\"utze, Yunpu Ma
arXiv:2606. 02388v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) improves large language model (LLM) agents by teaching them which actions lead to high rewards, but provides little supervision on what those actions do to the environment.
By Ning Lu, Baijiong Lin, Shengcai Liu, Jiahao Wu, Haoze Lv, Yanbin Wei, Lingting Zhu, Shengju Qian, Xin Wang, Ying-Cong Chen, Qi Wang, Ke Tang
arXiv:2607. 04963v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is the dominant paradigm for training Large Language Model (LLM) agents on long-horizon tasks.
By Qiuyi Qi, Tian Liang, Mutian Bao, Jinjian Zhang, Dongnan Liu, Wei Zhou, Linjian Mo, Ming Kong, Jie Liu, Feng Zhang, Qiang Zhu
Recent studies on world modeling for Large Language Model (LLM) agents typically formulate the learning objective as next-observation prediction. However, this objective ties supervision to what a transition happens to reveal, which may omit the dynamics most relevant to the agent's current decision.
arXiv:2607. 16204v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent growth in reinforcement learning (RL) has surfaced a need for diverse, specialized training environments.
By Darshan Deshpande
The paper introduces Imagine-then-Plan (ITP), a framework that lets agents learn by interacting with a learned world model to generate multi-step imagined trajectories. ITP features an adaptive lookahead mechanism that balances ultimate goals with task progress, producing richer signals about future outcomes. Experiments on various benchmarks show that ITP outperforms existing baselines, and analyses suggest the adaptive lookahead improves reasoning for complex tasks.
By Youwei Liu, Jian Wang, Hanlin Wang, Beichen Guo, Wenjie Li