Strengthening our Frontier Safety Framework
We’re strengthening the Frontier Safety Framework (FSF) to help identify and mitigate severe risks from advanced AI models.
The article presents early guidelines for safety cases in frontier AI training, outlining technical safeguards, operational practices, and methods for investigating misalignment incidents. It emphasizes the importance of structured safety documentation to guide the development and deployment of advanced AI systems. The guidelines aim to provide a framework for identifying and mitigating risks associated with frontier AI training.
We’re strengthening the Frontier Safety Framework (FSF) to help identify and mitigate severe risks from advanced AI models.
We’re forming a new industry body to promote the safe and responsible development of frontier AI systems: advancing AI safety research, identifying best practices and standards, and facilitating information sharing among policymakers and industry.
To support the safety of highly-capable AI systems, we are developing our approach to catastrophic risk preparedness, including building a Preparedness team and launching a challenge.
Sharing our updated framework for measuring and protecting against severe harm from frontier AI capabilities.
Ensuring that AI systems are built, deployed, and used safely is critical to our mission.
arXiv:2408. 02379v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Developing and certifying safe - or so-called trustworthy - AI has become an increasingly salient issue, especially in light of upcoming regulation such as the EU AI Act.
arXiv:2505. 22829v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper bridges distribution shift and AI safety through a comprehensive analysis of their conceptual and methodological synergies.
We’ve written a policy research paper identifying four strategies that can be used today to improve the likelihood of long-term industry cooperation on safety norms in AI: communicating risks and benefits, technical collaboration, increased transparency, and incentivizing standards. Our analysis shows that industry cooperation on safety will be instrumental in ensuring that AI systems are safe and beneficial, but competitive pressures could lead to a collective action problem, potentially causing AI companies to under-invest in safety.
arXiv:2607. 05163v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI systems may produce failures after deployment that pre-deployment safety assessments do not anticipate.
We describe our latest thinking in the hope of helping other AI developers address safety and misuse of deployed models.
OpenAI shares lessons from deploying long-running AI models, highlighting new safety risks, observed failures, and improved safeguards through iterative deployment.