The paper investigates how to combine on‑policy distillation (OPD) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for post‑training reasoning in large language models. It finds that a simple two‑stage approach—first applying OPD, then switching to RL—outperforms single‑signal methods and other joint baselines on logic and math reasoning benchmarks. The authors explain this advantage by showing that OPD broadens the model’s coverage of teacher‑supported solutions while RL sharpens performance within that support, and they provide practical guidance on when to switch based on OPD validation scores.
arXiv:2606. 11709v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) provides dense, token-level supervision for reasoning models by aligning a model's own distribution with the distribution it produces under privileged context, typically a verified solution.
By Leyi Pan, Shuchang Tao, Yunpeng Zhai, Lingzhe Zhang, Zhaoyang Liu, Bolin Ding, Aiwei Liu, Lijie Wen
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a powerful recipe for improving language-model reasoning, but it is expensive to repeat on every new strong model because the target model must generate many rollouts during training. As models scale, post-training itself becomes a bottleneck.
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) provides dense, token-level supervision for reasoning models by aligning a model's own distribution with the distribution it produces under privileged context, typically a verified solution. However, we show that the learning signal drawn from this distributional gap concentrates on style tokens rather than task-bearing ones, as the hinted model tends to produce more direct, shorter outputs.
SIPO (Self‑Instructing Policy Optimization) unifies reinforcement learning with on‑policy self‑distillation by using a contrastive self‑teacher to generate token‑level credit signals. The method samples multiple rollouts per prompt, pairs each with a reference answer and its mistakes, and uses the difference in teacher log‑probabilities to provide dense feedback while still respecting the overall task reward. Experiments on reasoning and code‑generation benchmarks show that SIPO outperforms both RLVR and OPSD baselines without requiring an external teacher or extra generation steps.
By Zhenrui Yue, Huimin Zeng, Yueqi Wang, Yaokun Liu, Fengran Mo, Jinghan Zhang, Mung Yao Jia, Gyuseok Lee, Yang Zhang, Na Wei, Dong Wang
Cliff is a reward‑shaping method for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards that identifies the first mistake in a language model’s reasoning process using an off‑the‑shelf teacher. By splitting each rollout into a correct prefix and an incorrect suffix, Cliff assigns token‑level advantages—positive for correct tokens and negative for the rest—providing fine‑grained supervision. Across 12 scenarios, Cliff outperforms on‑policy distillation by 15% and standard GRPO by 7%, even when the teacher is only modestly capable.
By Peixuan Han, Runhui Wang, Ketan Ramaneti, Jie Hao, Gerald Friedland, Chris Kong
arXiv:2607. 29209v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) broadcasts a single response-level reward to every token, while on-policy distillation (OPD) scores each token against a stronger teacher for a dense advantage but caps performance at teacher quality and discourages exploration beyond it.
By Yifan Ding, Xincheng Wei, Yoshua Y. Li, Ziheng Li, Yuquan Lu, Siyu Zhang, Dongsheng Ma, Rongxiang Weng, Xunliang Cai, Yun Chen
arXiv:2607. 05394v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a powerful recipe for improving language-model reasoning, but it is expensive to repeat on every new strong model because the target model must generate many rollouts during training.
By Shiyuan Feng, Huan-ang Gao, Haohan Chi, Hanlin Wu, Zhilong Zhang, Zheng Jiang, Bingxiang He, Wei-Ying Ma, Ya-Qin Zhang, Hao Zhou
The paper investigates on‑policy distillation (OPD) as a preparatory step for reinforcement learning (RL). It shows that students initialized with OPD achieve higher final RL performance than those trained directly with RL or with supervised fine‑tuning followed by RL, even when OPD offers little immediate accuracy gain. The study also finds that the choice of distillation objective (reverse‑KL vs forward‑KL) and the source of trajectories influence OPD’s effectiveness at different stages of RL training.
By Shuai Dong, Yongfu Zhu, Yuqi Xu, Weichu Xie, Liuwenpu, Ziyue Wang, Kaiwen Tuo, Congcong Wang, Siyuan Wang, Wenqi Shao, Shuai Yang, Ji Zhao, Caoyuan Ma, Wenzheng Chang, Taiqiang Wu, Xinlei Yu, Hongrui Wu, Xiaoxuan He, Fangke Chen, Dianyi Wang, Kanghui Tian, Sirry Chen, Xingyu Liu, Xiangnan Wu, Jiawei Guo, Haowen Hou, LingHan Chen, Zhongyu Wei, Jiaqi Wang
arXiv:2607. 18955v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has substantially improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models on tasks such as mathematical reasoning and code generation.
By Qiye Cai, Yichuan Ma, Linyang Li, Peiji Li, Yongkang Chen, Qipeng Guo, Yicheng Zou, Tao Gui, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing Qin
The paper reports that in on‑policy distillation for large language models, reasoning performance can be improved by supervising only a tiny fraction of generated tokens—sometimes just one or two tokens per reasoning trajectory, about 0.05% of all tokens. This sparse supervision consistently matches or exceeds full‑token training across nine teacher‑student setups on mathematical reasoning, and is also validated on coding reasoning, Llama models, and PPO‑based reinforcement learning with verifiable reward. The findings suggest that effective post‑training does not require token‑intensive supervision and may align more closely with natural learning processes that focus on critical reasoning steps.
By Zhishuai Liu, Xingzi Xu, Mehmet Saygin Seyfioglu, Pan Xu, Karim Bouyarmane
Cliff is a reward‑shaping method for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards that identifies the first mistake in a language model’s reasoning process using an off‑the‑shelf teacher. It splits each rollout into a correct prefix and an incorrect suffix, assigning positive token‑level advantages to the prefix and negative feedback to the suffix. Across 12 scenarios, Cliff improves reasoning performance, outperforming on‑policy distillation by 15% and standard GRPO by 7%, even with modest teachers.