arXiv:2606. 12569v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present eCREAM-MedCorpus, a new and unique large-scale dataset of clinical notes produced in Emergency Departments of Italian hospitals.
arXiv:2606. 12569v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present eCream-MedCorpus, a new and unique large-scale dataset of clinical notes produced in Emergency Departments of Italian hospitals.
arXiv:2606. 12569v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present EDEN (Emergency Department Electronic Notes), a new and unique large-scale corpus of clinical notes produced in Emergency Departments of Italian hospitals.
MedRAGChecker is a claim-level verification framework designed for biomedical retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG). It decomposes generated answers into atomic claims and assesses each claim’s support by combining evidence‑grounded natural language inference with biomedical knowledge‑graph consistency signals. The aggregated claim decisions provide diagnostics that distinguish retrieval and generation failures, such as faithfulness, under‑evidence, contradiction, and safety‑critical errors, and the system is distilled into compact models for scalable evaluation.
arXiv:2603. 05308v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Assessing whether an article supports an assertion is essential for hallucination detection and claim verification.
MedFabric is a new benchmark for detecting word‑level medical fabrications, comprising 646 fabricated statements each paired with a ground‑truth passage that shares the same LLM authorship and nearly identical wording. The study shows that current detectors perform poorly—expert clinicians achieve only 53.3% macro‑F1 and no detector family surpasses 60% without gold evidence—highlighting that detection hinges on evidence correctness rather than subtlety of fabrication. The authors demonstrate that a retrieval‑confidence gate can substantially improve performance, raising macro‑F1 from 61% to 74%.
arXiv:2602. 01086v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative AI can encode substantial medical knowledge, but patient-specific answers remain constrained by the context supplied at inference time.
arXiv:2608. 16643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated detection of errors in clinical documentation is a promising application of large language models (LLMs), yet decisions to deploy such models rest on benchmarks that evaluate each clinical note in isolation.
arXiv:2603. 10494v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evidence-grounded generation produces summaries whose claims should be supported by supplied evidence, but claim-level verifiers provide noisy feedback and can reward models that simply say less.
arXiv:2609.15964v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted for clinical question answering (QA). Current systems can attach citations to their answers, but...
arXiv:2608.22062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Longitudinal clinical event-relation verification determines whether a patient record supports a specified relation among two or more clinical events....
arXiv:2607. 20950v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: BoN improves model outputs by sampling several candidates and selecting one with a proxy score, but it assumes that complete candidates can be evaluated reliably.