arXiv:2507. 04219v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current unlearning methods for LLMs optimize on the private information they seek to remove by incorporating it into their fine-tuning data.
By Yan Scholten, Sophie Xhonneux, Leo Schwinn, Stephan G\"unnemann
arXiv:2608. 16700v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Various machine unlearning techniques have been developed in response to privacy legislation requirements, enabling individuals to exercise their legal right to have their data $D_f$ removed from a machine learning model.
By Hang Zhang, Kaifeng Zhang, Yixiao Ma, Weijie Xu, Ye Zhu, Kai Ming Ting
Machine unlearning, which aims to remove the influence of specific training data from a trained model, is a key requirement for privacy, accountability, and adaptive deployment. We argue that many unlearning methods are vulnerable to a simple clustering attack, which can recover class structure in an unsupervised manner, limiting their suitability for continual deployment where removal requests must be handled reliably on demand.
arXiv:2606. 17110v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly trained on proprietary or sensitive data, from private healthcare and financial records to user conversations containing secrets.
By Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Ngoc Phu Doan, Pedram Zaree, Ihsen Alouani, Nael Abu-Ghazaleh
arXiv:2607. 23934v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning, which aims to remove the influence of specific training data from a trained model, is a key requirement for privacy, accountability, and adaptive deployment.
By Anjie Le, Can Peng, Hongcheng Guo, J. Alison Noble
arXiv:2606. 17464v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are a canonical way to assess a machine learning model's privacy properties.
By Jeffrey G. Wang, Jason Wang, Marvin Li, Seth Neel