arXiv Computation and Language

Switch-SWE: Do Coding Agents Hold Focus When Switching Between Unfinished Tasks?

Switch‑SWE is a new benchmark that tests whether coding agents can resume an unfinished task after working on other tasks from the same repository. It provides 200 focus tasks from 19 Python repositories, each paired with matched uninterrupted and switched sessions, and evaluates agents on the final patch only. The benchmark reveals that interleaved work creates an average 11.5‑percentage‑point gap in task resolution, and a context‑management plug‑in can improve performance by 5.5 to 15.5 percentage points.

arXiv AI
Oct 23

PAUSE: Search-Free Steering of Coding Agents Before Their First Source-Code Edit

PAUSE is a steering framework for coding agents that intervenes once before the agent’s first source‑code edit, eliminating the need for learned monitors, checkpoint searches, or extra model calls. By having a Planner generate a repair plan from the task and pre‑edit transcript, the same agent can resume execution with this plan, preserving context and workspace. Experiments on SWE‑bench Verified and Multilingual show that PAUSE improves resolution rates by up to 16.8% online and recovers 35.4% of failed tasks offline, while reducing Executor token usage by 33‑41% compared to restarts.

By Viral Patel, Boyin Tan, Jason Xue, Youcheng Sun
arXiv AI
Oct 15

Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0: Automating Diverse Task Construction and Measuring Sustained Agent Progress

arXiv:2610.14146v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon terminal benchmarks measure whether an agent can sustain progress through extended workflows with process rewards, not only whether its fi...

By Zongxia Li, Zhongzhi Li, Yucheng Shi, Ruhan Wang, Junyao Yang, Chengsong Huang, Zhichao Liu, Xiyang Wu, Anhao Li, Yue Yu, Ergan Shang, Fuxiao Liu, Tong Zheng, Ninghao Liu, Lichao Sun, Haitao Mi, Leowei Liang
arXiv AI
Oct 16

What Coding Agents Leave Unsaid: Measuring Task-State Gaps Between Execution and Reports

The paper introduces CTXGAP, a study measuring how much information coding agents omit from their user-facing reports compared to their full execution logs. Across 37 coding tasks, agents answer 93.6% of task-state questions when asked directly, but report-only readers recover only 52.0% of the same information, revealing a 40.7‑point gap. Even at final checkpoints of verified fixes, the gap remains significant, and detailed terminal scrollback improves recovery only to 73.6%. The study highlights that missing details in reports can leave supervisors unaware of failures, workarounds, and risks that need scrutiny.

By Guoyang Xu, Rui Zhang, Xiuyu Wu, Hao Chen
arXiv AI
Oct 26

SWE-Shift: Evaluating Coding Agents in Evolving Workspaces

SWE-Shift is a new benchmark that tests coding agents in environments where tasks and workspaces can change mid-execution. It presents 120 scenarios across 12 change families, each evaluated at nine intervention points, comparing a Clean continuation (no change) with a Shifted continuation (task-relevant update). The benchmark shows that all evaluated agents perform better on Clean than on Shifted, with significant drops in success rates and zero paired success for certain change types.

By Victor Shea-Jay Huang, Rongqing Li, Zhangyue Yin, Kelong Mao, Yaqi Zhao, Xinyuan Wang, Yao Yin, Lirui Luo, Renrui Zhang, Hongsheng Li
arXiv AI
Oct 15

SkillHorizon: Constructing Long-Horizon Agent Tasks through Skill Composition

arXiv:2610.14966v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon agents must complete workflows in which later activities depend on earlier outputs and changes to shared state. A key challenge for evalua...

By Yuxuan Liu, Zhaochen Su, Hangyu Guo, Shijue Huang, Zhixiong Zhang, Kawai Chung, Zhongwei Xie, Tianshi Zheng, Wei Fan, Qing Zong, Haochen Shi, Baixuan Xu, Haoran Li, Yangqiu Song
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 15

Interlock: From Local Correctness to Task Completion in Long-Horizon Agents

Interlock is a framework that transforms long‑horizon tasks into typed completion graphs, linking evidence, decisions, and required effects through grounding, coupling, and realization edges. It compiles these graphs into a resettable workspace, a public request, and an evaluation rubric, and uses source‑coverage, public‑input, and agent‑as‑judge reviews to ensure that all mandatory requirements are met. Fine‑tuning Qwen3.6 backbones on Interlock‑generated trajectories improves pass rates on AutomationBench, JobBench, and Harvey LAB, showing that the synthesized experience benefits external task environments.

By Linji Hao, Yanji He, Zihan Wang, Hansi Yang, Jiayuan Zhang, Hongyan Hao, Qi Gu, Yan Feng, Han Wu