arXiv Computer Vision

Beyond Spatial Benchmarks: From Spatial Reasoning to Navigation

The paper investigates whether progress on spatial reasoning benchmarks translates into improved navigation performance. It finds a gap between benchmark-oriented spatial specialization and real navigation, and proposes aligning spatial supervision with navigation goals, phases, and decision learning. The authors introduce Spatial-Nav-100K, a two-stage fine-tuning approach, and Spatial-NPD, a teacher–student framework that eliminates explicit spatial reasoning at inference, achieving state‑of‑the‑art success rates on HM3D and MP3D with efficient GPU usage.

arXiv Computer Vision
3d ago

InsightMap: Structured Spatial Modeling for Embodied Multimodal Reasoning

InsightMap is a framework that uses top‑down maps as explicit spatial memory and action‑conditioned prediction targets for language‑guided navigation. It links historical views to labeled map locations and employs a shared multimodal backbone to jointly learn navigation action prediction and post‑action map generation, providing auxiliary training supervision. The approach supports a unified RGB‑D pipeline for navigation, visual question answering, situated reasoning, and 3D grounding, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on R2R‑CE, RxR‑CE, ScanQA, SQA3D, ScanRefer, and outperforming baselines on the Unitree Go2 platform.

By Hongpei Zheng, Hujun Yin
arXiv Computer Vision
3d ago

Spatial-OPSD: Self-Improving Spatial Reasoning via Label-Free Self-Distillation

Spatial-OPSD is a label‑free self‑improvement framework for vision‑language models that leverages spatial priors such as depth, 3D relations, and camera geometry to provide dense token‑level supervision. During training, a privileged teacher uses these priors while the student learns from only the original visual‑language input, and a recursive round‑wise scheme allows repeated self‑improvement without moving the teacher. Across four VLM families, one round of Spatial‑OPSD improves the five‑benchmark average, and three rounds push a strong spatially specialized model to the open‑source frontier, achieving the highest average among open models and best results on three of five spatial reasoning benchmarks.

By Zhenyu Liu, Zhangquan Chen, Keyi Chen, Mingze Sun, Xiang An, Haodong Jing, Ruqi Huang
arXiv AI
Jul 14

ABot-N1: Toward a General Visual Language Navigation Foundation Model

arXiv:2607. 10383v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual Language Navigation foundation models aim to unify deep reasoning for grounded spatial decisions with broad versatility for diverse embodied tasks.

By Ruiyan Gong, Yingnan Guo, Junjun Hu, Jintao Kong, Xiaoxu Leng, Tianlun Li, Weize Li, Fei Liu, Zhicheng Liu, Jia Lu, Minghua Luo, Chenlin Ming, Yanfen Shen, Jiyue Tao, Zhengbo Wang, Mingyang Yin, Minqi Gu, Zihao Guan, Wei Guo, Guoqing Liu, Huachong Pang, Menglin Yang, Zeqian Ye, Xiaoxiao Geng, Zhining Gu, Honglin Han, Di Jing, Hongyu Pan, Mingchao Sun, Kuan Yang, Jianfang Zhang, Yanghong Chen, Ye He, Wei Mei, Jiahao Shi, Xiangpo Yang, Yanqing Zhu, Zedong Chu, Xiaolong Wu, Mu Xu
arXiv AI
Jun 9

SpaceVLN: A Zero-Shot Vision-and-Language Navigation Agent with Online Spatial Cognitive Memory and Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 08992v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-and-Language Navigation in continuous environments requires agents to understand the spatial structure of previously unseen environments in order to follow language instructions.

By Yucheng Deng, Pingrui Lai, Xinhai Li, Chenjia Bai, Xiaoheng Deng, Chengnuo Sun, Xuelong Li, Hua Yang
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 16

EgoPathBench: Evaluating Zero-Shot Egocentric Waypoint Decision-Making in Vision-Language Models

EgoPathBench is a new dataset and benchmark that tests zero‑shot egocentric waypoint decision‑making in vision‑language models. Each task presents an egocentric RGB image, a natural‑language goal, and numbered visible waypoints, and models must return traversable candidates or an ordered route. The benchmark evaluates candidate feasibility, edge legality, and goal arrival under point‑agent or embodied geometry, covering 31,852 training, 1,345 validation, and 1,111 benchmark questions. "whyItMatters":"The benchmark reveals that current VLMs perform poorly on integrated navigation tasks, highlighting a gap in spatial intelligence that can be addressed by fine‑tuning with the released training data."

By Yang Zhao, Zhuo Chen, Xubo Yang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

Parse, Search, and Confirmation: Training-Free Aerial Vision-and-Dialog Navigation with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Structured Spatial Memory

In this paper, we tackle the Aerial Vision-and-Dialog Navigation (AVDN) task in the training-free setting for resource-efficient high-altitude UAV navigation. Naively applying MLLMs leads to unreliable navigation due to weak directional grounding and the lack of explicit spatial memory.