Low-quality face recognition (LQFR) remains challenging due to the difficulty of matching degraded query (probe) images against low-quality (LQ) enrollment (gallery) imagery and the scarcity of traini...
arXiv:2609.01014v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Low-quality face recognition (LQFR) remains challenging due to the difficulty of matching degraded query (probe) images against low-quality (LQ) enroll...
By Vedat Can Dilaver, Benjamin S. Riggan
arXiv:2606. 31664v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Performance in face and speaker verification is largely driven by margin-penalty softmax losses such as CosFace and ArcFace.
By Dimitrios Koutsianos, Ladislav Mo\v{s}ner, Yannis Panagakis, Themos Stafylakis
DenseFace introduces a bias‑mitigation technique for face recognition that operates on pre‑trained models without retraining. It models each person’s face embeddings with a von Mises‑Fisher distribution and uses a density‑aware probabilistic matching procedure to account for demographic differences. Experiments show that DenseFace consistently reduces racial bias across various architectures and datasets while preserving recognition accuracy.
By Mansur Bultygov, Vadim Seliutin, Dmitry Nekhaev, Ivan Laptev
arXiv:2607. 28936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Facial biometric identification relies on the distinctiveness of user attributes within a high-dimensional embedding space.
By Omid Ahmadieh, Nima Karimian
arXiv:2606. 31704v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The deployment of face detection models in real-world applications raises important fairness concerns, as these systems may showcase performance disparities across demographic groups.
By Maxime Moussi, Beno\^it Ronval, Siegfried Nijssen, F\'elicien Schiltz
The paper introduces ViT‑HarDis, a method that conditions attention head disentanglement on sample difficulty in Vision Transformers for face recognition. By applying stronger head decorrelation to hard samples—those with high cosine similarity to negative class centers—the approach encourages specialization where identity ambiguity is greatest. Experiments on WebFace4M and MS1MV3 show that ViT‑HarDis improves over baseline and uniform disentanglement, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on IJB‑B, IJB‑C, and TinyFace without architectural changes or extra inference cost.
By Tahar Chettaoui, Guray Ozgur, Eduarda Caldeira, Naser Damer, Fadi Boutros
arXiv:2606. 11615v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The widespread adoption of face recognition (FR) technologies raises serious privacy concerns, as facial data can be exploited without consent.
By Omid Ahmadieh, Nima Karimian
arXiv:2608. 03395v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deepfake technologies pose increasing threats to facial privacy and identity security, motivating proactive defenses that protect facial images before misuse.
By Sungwon Cho, Kwanghyun Ko, Myungjoo Kang
Face Video Restoration (FVR) aims to recover high-fidelity facial videos from degraded input while preserving identity and semantic consistency across frames. Existing methods often struggle to simultaneously address three key challenges: identity shift, viewpoint-entangled guidance, and perceptual realism.
The paper audits the MS1MV3 face‑recognition training dataset and identifies five defect categories—exact/near duplicates, split identities, crop errors, multiple‑face ambiguity, and invalid content. Using IResNet‑50 and ArcFace, the authors show that correcting these defects, especially duplicate removal, can maintain or improve recognition performance while reducing training effort. The study highlights that dataset quality significantly influences large‑scale face‑recognition outcomes.
By Ana Dias, Jo\~ao Ribeiro Pinto, Hugo Proen\c{c}a, Jo\~ao C. Neves
ScoreMix is a self‑contained synthetic data generation method that improves recognition tasks by mixing class‑conditioned scores along reverse diffusion trajectories, thereby creating hard synthetic samples without external resources. The approach shows that selecting classes far apart in the discriminator’s embedding space yields larger performance gains, up to 3% more improvement than proximity‑based selection. Across eight public face recognition benchmarks, ScoreMix boosts accuracy by up to 7 percentage points, demonstrating robustness and practicality without hyperparameter tuning.
By Parsa Rahimi, Sebastien Marcel