Different Defects, Different Effects: A Controlled Audit of Face Recognition Training Data
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2407. 13922v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Face recognition (FR) systems are widely deployed in critical applications, making their reliability and robustness across diverse populations and conditions essential.
arXiv:2609.01014v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-quality face recognition (LQFR) remains challenging due to the difficulty of matching degraded query (probe) images against low-quality (LQ) enroll...
Low-quality face recognition (LQFR) remains challenging due to the difficulty of matching degraded query (probe) images against low-quality (LQ) enrollment (gallery) imagery and the scarcity of traini...
The paper introduces FADNet, a face authenticity detector that treats forgery detection as a one‑class classification problem, training only on authentic faces. It uses Evidential Deep Learning to measure uncertainty and a pseudo‑forgery generator to sharpen decision boundaries. Experiments on DF40 and ASFD show FADNet surpasses state‑of‑the‑art methods with 96.63% accuracy and 98.83% precision.
arXiv:2512.15774v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The absence of large-scale masked face datasets challenges masked face detection and recognition. We propose a two-step generative data augmentatio...
arXiv:2604. 07282v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated face recognition has made rapid strides over the past decade due to the unprecedented rise of deep neural network (DNN) models that can be trained for domain-specific tasks.