arXiv Machine Learning

Unified Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network solver for Power Flow, Optimal Power Flow and State Estimation

arXiv AI
Sep 25

Reachability-Based Formal Verification of Graph Neural Networks with Node and Edge Features

The paper extends the neural network verification framework to graph neural networks by introducing GraphStar sets, which model uncertainty over both node and edge features. This allows sound propagation of linear message‑passing operations and ReLU nonlinearities for GCN and GINE layers. Experiments on power system tasks (PF, OPF, CFA) and graph classification benchmarks (ENZYMES, PROTEINS) show that the method, called GNNV, yields tighter robustness guarantees than CORA and provides, for the first time, edge‑aware guarantees for GINE‑based models under joint node and edge perturbations.

By Anne M. Tumlin, Ben Wooding, Zhenxuan Shao, Diego Manzanas Lopez, Tyler Derr, Taylor T. Johnson
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks for AC Power Flow: The Role of Inductive Biases and Physical Constraints

The paper presents a unified benchmark of graph neural network (GNN) architectures for predicting AC power flow (ACPF) on IEEE 14‑bus and 118‑bus systems. It isolates the effects of message‑passing mechanisms and inductive biases by using identical preprocessing, training procedures, and comparable parameter budgets. The study finds that anisotropic message‑passing, explicit edge features for line impedances, and global context aggregation yield the best trade‑off between predictive accuracy and physical consistency, while two or three message‑passing layers are generally optimal under a fixed parameter budget.

By Federico Clerici, Ferran Bohigas-Daranas, Hamid Latif-Mart\'inez, Eduardo Prieto-Araujo, Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt, Pere Barlet-Ros
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13

Power Flow Feasibility Assessment Using Variational Graph Autoencoders

arXiv:2607. 09122v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data-driven methods, including graph neural networks, have been studied for accelerating power flow calculations in recent years, but very little attention has been paid to the solution feasibility, which can be obtained by traditional solvers.

By Ferran Bohigas-Daranas, Hamid Latif-Martinez, Eduardo Prieto-Araujo, Pere Barlet-Ros, Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt
arXiv AI
Jul 16

MxGPS: Multiplex Graph Transformers for a Power Grid Foundation Model

arXiv:2607. 13763v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Single-task fine-tuning of graph neural networks (GNNs) for power grid problems exhibits a systematic failure mode: models that achieve the lowest in-distribution error degrade the most under topology shift.

By Charilaos Papaioannou, Ioannis Tsantilas, Dimitris Giannakakos, Vasilis Michalakopoulos, Sotiris Pelekis, Vangelis Marinakis, Arsam Aryandoust, Antonello Monti, Ricardo J. Bessa, Perdo P. Vergara, Jochen Cremer, Elissaios Sarmas
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 15

MxGPS: Multiplex Graph Transformers for a Power Grid Foundation Model

Single-task fine-tuning of graph neural networks (GNNs) for power grid problems exhibits a systematic failure mode: models that achieve the lowest in-distribution error degrade the most under topology shift. We term this topology overfitting: the tendency of task-specific gradient signals to encode relational structure particular to the training topologies rather than the underlying physics, causing models to fail on unseen grids despite strong in-distribution performance.

arXiv AI
Aug 18

Graph Machine Learning: An Opportunity for Power Systems

arXiv:2608. 16494v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern power systems face growing operational complexity driven by the integration of renewable energy sources, decentralization, and the need for real-time decision-making across a wide range of timescales.

By Martin Sadric, Sebastian P\"utz, Christian Nauck, Veit Hagenmeyer, Frank Hellmann, Dirk Witthaut, Benjamin Sch\"afer
arXiv AI
Aug 11

GENCO - A Unified Neural Solver Embedded in a Development Framework for Steady-State Grid Analysis

arXiv:2608. 09921v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models are transforming business workflows and boosting productivity, yet they remain largely absent from engineering domains such as power system analysis, where strict physical consistency must be enforced.

By Alban Puech, Matteo Mazzonelli, Tamara R. Govindasamy, Mangaliso Mngomezulu, H\'ector Maeso-Garc\'ia, Thomas Tolhurst, Javad Bayazi, Ali Moeini, Naomi Simumba, Celia Cintas, David Nelischer, Romeo Kienzler, Jonas Weiss, Anna Varbella, Florian D\"orfler, Gabriela Hug, Martin Mevissen, Juan Bernab\'e-Moreno, Fran\c{c}ois Mirall\`es, Hendrik F. Hamann, Etienne Vos, Thomas Brunschwiler
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 29

AC Power Flow Contingency Analysis Using a Single Deep Neural Network

The paper introduces a method that uses a single deep neural network, trained only on basecase AC power flow data, to predict post-contingency operating states for any single-line outage. It frames this prediction as a fixed-point iteration and provides sufficient convergence conditions, certifying them via semidefinite programming. Numerical experiments on the IEEE 118-bus system show that the certified conditions hold for all tested contingencies and that accurate state estimates are achieved in only a few iterations.

By Md Obaidur Rahman, Junjie Qin, Vassilis Kekatos
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Physics-Aware Random Walk Fingerprints for Scalable Power Grid Graph Classification

The paper introduces Multi-Channel Physics-Aware Random Walk Fingerprints (MC-PA-RWF), a lightweight graph-level representation that incorporates physical edge states into random-walk propagation for power grid graphs. By constructing multiple edge-weighted channels from domain-relevant attributes and concatenating channel-specific fingerprints, the method achieves high balanced accuracy on PowerGraph benchmarks, outperforming topology-only RWF and matching or surpassing several graph neural network baselines. Experiments on three benchmark systems show statistically significant improvements, with the node-edge extension reaching up to 99.32% balanced accuracy and boosting failure-class F1 scores by 1.60–5.84 percentage points.

By Adnan Anwar