arXiv:2609.05992v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As LLM-based agents continue to advance, their evaluation has become increasingly multifaceted: a capable agent must not only achieve high task complet...
By Hengle Jiang, Qijun Cai, Ziying Luo, Ke Tang
arXiv:2609.13396v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multi-objective Bayesian optimisation (MOBO) is a sample-efficient approach for optimising expensive black-box functions with multiple objectives. In M...
By Chao Jiang, Yueling Huang, Miqing Li
arXiv:2606. 15115v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-objective optimization (MOO) has emerged as a powerful approach to solving complex optimization problems involving multiple objectives.
By Yiyi Zhu, Yaolin Wen, Xiang Xia, Xin An, Hanyi Si, Xiang Shu, Yangde Fu, Liang Dou, Hong Qian
arXiv:2606. 00862v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) have been widely used for expensive black-box optimization problems.
By Xiao Jin, Yongxiong Wang, Haobo Liu, Yudong Du, Yukun Du
The paper evaluates the Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN) as a surrogate model in surrogate‑assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) for expensive optimization problems. Through extensive experiments in both offline and online settings across a range of problem types—including single‑objective, multi‑objective, constrained, combinatorial, mixed‑variable, and engineering tasks—the study finds that TabPFN’s effectiveness varies strongly with the problem characteristics. The authors conclude that TabPFN should be used selectively, with customized model management and algorithm design tailored to data availability, landscape complexity, and search‑space properties.
By Lu Han, Jin Wang, Yuchen Li, Haoran Gu, Shulei Liu, Ziyang Shi, Wenao Lu, Handing Wang
arXiv:2609.14418v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Dynamic multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling requires decisions to be made under precedence constraints, limited resources, multiple ex...
By Yuan Tian, Yi Mei, Mengjie Zhang
arXiv:2607. 08791v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Designing effective multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) algorithms requires balancing many interdependent design choices whose optimal configuration is problem-dependent and typically demands deep expertise.
By Georgios Laskaris, Reuben Brasher, Niki van Stein, Elena Raponi, Thomas B\"ack, Florian Neukart
The paper introduces LLM-EBG, an evolutionary framework that uses a large language model as a generative operator to automatically create optimization benchmarks. By generating unconstrained single-objective continuous minimization problems expressed as mathematical formulas, the framework can produce benchmarks that consistently favor a target algorithm over a comparison algorithm in over 80% of trials. Landscape analysis shows that these generated problems exhibit distinct geometric traits, such as sensitivity to variable scaling, reflecting the search behaviors of different optimization methods.
By Yuhiro Ono, Tomohiro Harada, Yukiya Miura
The paper introduces TGL-NSGA-II, a low‑fidelity framework that uses a pretrained teacher to stratify samples by difficulty and class, then applies a short knowledge‑distillation step (KD‑Lite) before scoring candidates on a stratified evaluation set. The teacher‑guided scores are fused with a Gaussian‑process surrogate to select candidates for full evaluation, and the method is evaluated on keyword spotting and bird‑call classification tasks. Results show high Kendall‑τ values (0.74 and 0.62), a 41% reduction in proxy‑score variance, and improved hypervolume and false‑positive rates compared to full NSGA‑II, while running 2.2× faster under a constrained evaluation budget.
By Soumen Garai, Suman Samui
arXiv:2605.28703v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Baldwinian and Lamarckian evolution have existed for a long time in evolutionary algorithms (EAs) without ever dominating the academic litera...
By In\`es Benito, Johannes F. Lutzeyer, Benjamin Doerr
arXiv:2606. 31990v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We analyze the effect of optimizing the initial population of genetic programming (GP) for symbolic regression (SR) on the accuracy and complexity of solutions.
By Lukas Kammerer, Gabriel Kronberger, Deaglan J. Bartlett, Harry Desmond, Pedro G. Ferreira, Stephan Winkler
arXiv:2606. 03904v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-objective optimization (MOO) underlies many machine learning problems, yet MOO solvers across the loss-balancing, gradient-balancing, and Pareto-based families almost universally hand their reconciled directions to Adam~\cite{kingma2015adam}.
By Fengbei Liu, Rachit Saluja, Sunwoo Kwak, Ruibo Wang, Ruining Deng, Heejong Kim, Johannes C. Paetzold, Mert R. Sabuncu