Hugging Face Trending Papers

Does Compression Imply Generalization? A Minimum Description Length Perspective

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

Does Compression Imply Generalization? A Minimum Description Length Perspective

The paper investigates whether compression explains why over‑parameterized neural networks generalize, using the minimum description length (MDL) principle. It introduces prequential regret, a computable metric from the training trajectory, and shows that in the nearly interpolating regime it upper‑bounds the description length of the trained parameters, leading to a high‑probability generalization bound in the PAC‑MDL setting. The study also connects MDL with the algorithm‑level information bottleneck by bounding encoder‑complexity correction with MDL parameter description length, and demonstrates that prequential regret correlates strongly (Pearson > 0.9) with generalization error on CIFAR‑10 and CIFAR‑100.

By Lincen Yang, Jiayang Shi, Nan Pu, Dani\"el M. Pelt, Matthijs van Leeuwen, Zhong Li, Shujian Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 19

Indexed Bellman Information Complexity

arXiv:2606. 11171v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We develop indexed Bellman information complexity, a representation-level theory of interactive decision making centered on information indices and reference histories.

By Yunbei Xu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 3

Data- and Variance-dependent Regret Bounds for Online Tabular MDPs

arXiv:2602. 01903v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This work studies online episodic tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) with known transitions and develops best-of-both-worlds algorithms that achieve refined data-dependent regret bounds in the adversarial regime and variance-dependent regret bounds in the stochastic regime.

By Mingyi Li, Taira Tsuchiya, Kenji Yamanishi
arXiv AI
6d ago

Quantitative Generalization Bounds for Multi-Layer Transformers: A Few Long Strings can Beat Many Short Ones

The paper presents quantitative generalization bounds for fixed‑precision transformer models, addressing both in‑distribution statistical generalization and length generalization. It derives guarantees based on model parameters, quantization space, and alphabet size, and shows how training length and sample size trade off, with longer training being exponentially more efficient. Experiments confirm the theoretical predictions.

By Marius Henry, Michael Rizvi-Martel, Michael Hahn
arXiv AI
Sep 21

Large Language Models As Shannon Lossy Compressors Not Solomonoff Induction Estimators: The Singularity Is Not Near Without Symbolic Model Synthesis

The paper argues that Large Language Models (LLMs) do not function as Solomonoff induction estimators because their training objectives—cross‑entropy, negative log‑likelihood, and next‑token prediction—optimize fit to a supplied conditional distribution rather than a program‑weighted universal mixture. It further contends that additional computation alone does not transform these models into optimal predictors without external hyper‑parameter or architectural changes. The authors suggest that neurosymbolic machine learning, exemplified by models such as Fable and Astra, represents a shift toward symbolic model synthesis, moving beyond purely statistical LLMs.

By Hector Zenil, Abicumaran Uthamacumaran, Luan Ozelim
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 7

Conformal Prediction Sets Quantify Information Gain: A Theoretical Perspective

Conformal prediction sets, which provide finite‑sample coverage guarantees, are examined from an information‑theoretic perspective. The authors introduce a family of generalized information measures that link set size and coverage to entropy, showing that Shannon mutual information can be expressed exactly in terms of these measures. They prove that, in classification tasks, the reduction in set size due to additional information is bounded by calibration‑dependent members of this family and satisfies a data‑processing inequality, and they empirically demonstrate that set‑size reduction and mutual information can rank features differently in greedy selection.

By Kevin Zhang, Stephen Bates