arXiv Machine Learning

Counterfactual Action Evaluation, Observation Bottlenecks, and Representation Geometry in Joint-Embedding Predictive World Models

arXiv:2610. 02860v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low latent prediction error does not establish that a world model distinguishes the consequences of its actions.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

JEPA-x: Cross-Predictive Physics Grounding for Forecastable Latent Dynamics

JEPA-x is a cross‑predictive physics grounding method that aligns visual latent dynamics with privileged physical trajectories. By treating visual observations and physical states as two views of the same action‑conditioned trajectory and sharing a predictor, it forces the model to learn a common transition rule for both modalities. The physical branch is only used during training, so deployment incurs no extra cost, and the approach significantly reduces rollout drift and boosts control success across a multi‑task suite.

By Kehan Wen, Ziming Li, Siyuan Luo, Fan Shi
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

What Can Latent World Models Know? Physical Parameter Identifiability in Multimodal Predictive Representations

arXiv:2607. 27017v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A central premise of latent world models is that predicting the future forces a representation to internalize the physics of its environment.

By Kaizhen Tan (New York University, Carnegie Mellon University), Xin Xu (Carnegie Mellon University), Siru Tao (Carnegie Mellon University), Hanzhe Hong (Carnegie Mellon University), Yang Feng (Columbia University), Heqing Du (Columbia University)
arXiv AI
5d ago

Learning Intrinsic Dynamics in Latent World Models

The paper investigates how encouraging action predictability in latent world models can preserve intrinsic dynamics, which are crucial for planning. By deriving a theoretical lower bound and conducting empirical tests, the authors show that action predictability prevents the encoder from merging distinct action outcomes, even when visual appearance varies. Using a method called Concat IDM, they achieve a substantial increase in planning success on the Push‑T benchmark, from 9.1% to 77.2%, demonstrating the practical benefit of this inductive bias.

By Jiamin Shi, Yuanhong Zhang, Zhiyang Liu, Jiawei Sun, Jingwen Fu
arXiv AI
Sep 25

AD-WM: Action-Discriminative World Models for Counterfactual Model Predictive Control

AD-WM is a new action‑discriminative joint‑embedding world model designed for counterfactual model predictive control. It augments residual latent dynamics with action‑recovery regularization based on inverse dynamics and conditional mutual information, while discarding auxiliary heads at test time so that MPC remains unchanged. Experiments on OGBench‑Cube and other simulation environments show substantial gains in hard‑start success and mean success, and zero‑shot transfer to a Franka robot improves pick‑and‑place success from 42.2% to 71.1%.

By Jiabin Qiu, Zixuan Chen, Hongye Cao, Jieqi Shi, Jing Huo, Yang Gao
arXiv Machine Learning
6d ago

One-Step Prediction Fidelity Is a Poor Proxy for Planning Performance in JEPA World Models

The paper challenges the common practice of selecting latent world models based on one‑step prediction loss, arguing that this metric poorly predicts planning performance. Using a frozen‑decoder protocol, the authors decompose one‑step error into encoder‑inherent and predictor‑added components and evaluate goal‑conditioned planning across three continuous‑control environments. Their experiments show that improvements in one‑step fidelity do not correlate with planning success, with correlation coefficients near zero and inconsistent exchange rates across tasks.

By Joshua Cheung, Zhang He
arXiv AI
Aug 19

No Gaussian Required: Contrastive Inverse Dynamics for JEPA World Models

The paper introduces Action-Contrastive Masked Transition Modeling (AC‑MTM), a method that replaces the Gaussian regularizer used in Joint‑Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) with a contrastive inverse‑dynamics head. AC‑MTM trains a forward latent‑prediction model while an auxiliary inverse‑dynamics task forces the encoder to distinguish actions from latent transitions, preventing collapse without requiring a target network or reconstruction loss. Experiments on pixel‑control and multi‑object visual tasks show that AC‑MTM matches or surpasses the performance of the Gaussian‑based SIGReg regularizer, achieving up to 20–24 point improvements on the OGBench Visual Scene benchmark.

By Jack Boylan, Chris Hokamp
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18

No Gaussian Required: Contrastive Inverse Dynamics for JEPA World Models

The paper introduces Action-Contrastive Masked Transition Modeling (AC‑MTM), a method that stabilizes Joint‑Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) without relying on Gaussian regularization. AC‑MTM adds a training‑only inverse‑dynamics head that uses Action‑NCE to force each latent transition to identify its generating action, thereby preventing encoder collapse. Experiments on pixel‑control and multi‑object visual tasks show that AC‑MTM trains stably from scratch and matches or surpasses the performance of SIGReg, achieving up to a 24‑point improvement on the OGBench Visual Scene benchmark.