Towards Data Science

A Google Team Measured Half of My Argument, and Left the Other Half Open

The article titled "A Google Team Measured Half of My Argument, and Left the Other Half Open" is part of a series on spec‑driven test automation (Part 3). It discusses how a Google team evaluated only half of the author’s argument, leaving the remaining portion unresolved. The post was originally published on the Towards Data Science platform.

Towards Data Science
Sep 24

Towards Spec-Driven Test Automation: Part 1

The article "Towards Spec-Driven Test Automation: Part 1" discusses how a green test suite may not truly reflect software quality. It explores the limitations of relying solely on test pass rates and introduces the concept of specification-driven testing as a more robust approach. The post is published on Towards Data Science.

By Gal Arav
Towards Data Science
1d ago

Why a Tiny GPT Can Know Two Facts and Still Not Connect Them

A tiny GPT model was trained to memorize every fact presented to it, yet it failed to answer any question that required combining two of those facts. The author tested a one-line fix suggested in a recent paper, which only partially resolved the issue. The post highlights the limitations of small language models in integrating multiple pieces of information.

By Utkarsh Mangal
Towards Data Science
4d ago

Our AI Has an Invisible Footprint — Let's see How to Measure It

The article discusses the challenge of measuring the impact of AI systems, noting that obtaining data is now easier than deciding how to interpret it. It highlights the difficulty of turning raw numbers into actionable insights. The piece was originally published on Towards Data Science.

By Sabrine Bendimerad
Towards Data Science
Oct 18

Both Charts Are Right. So Why Do They Disagree?

The article discusses a statistical paradox illustrating how combining data can reverse the narrative presented by individual charts. It explains that both charts can be correct yet appear contradictory when aggregated. The piece highlights the importance of careful data integration to avoid misleading conclusions.

By Sara A. Metwalli
Towards Data Science
Aug 20

The LLM Judge That Kept Agreeing With Itself

The article recounts a production incident where a large language model (LLM) was used to evaluate the outputs of another LLM, and the judging model consistently agreed with itself. It explores the implications of relying on one model to assess another’s work, highlighting the potential pitfalls of such an approach. The narrative offers lessons on the limits of trusting automated evaluation systems in real‑world deployments.

By Priyansh Bhardwaj