arXiv AI

IMPACT: Attention Is the Interaction Map for Scalable Interaction-Aware World Model Training

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

Acting in Meters: Learning Metric Interactions for Precise Robotic Manipulation

The paper introduces a metric interaction framework for robotic manipulation that explicitly models object- and scene-level interactions in Cartesian space. It uses Interaction‑Centric Tokens (ICTs) to represent end‑effector trajectories relative to objects and a Metric Action Interaction Field (MAIF) to attend to scene point‑cloud features for geometry‑conditioned action corrections. Experiments show modest but consistent improvements across several benchmarks, including LIBERO, RoboTwin 2.0, and real‑world tasks.

By Lijie Wang, Zheng Lu, Yiming Wang, Heyang Yu, Kenghou Hoi, Bowen Hu, Di Cui, Tianyu Xin, Haoran Liao, Wanqi Zhong, Xingjie Fan, Yizhao Xu, Ziliang Wang, Fei Gao, Yiming Li
arXiv AI
Jun 2

From Human Videos to Robot Manipulation: A Survey on Scalable Vision-Language-Action Learning with Human-Centric Data

arXiv:2606. 00054v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent progress in generalizable embodied control has been driven by large-scale pretraining of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models.

By Zhiyuan Feng, Qixiu Li, Huizhi Liang, Rushuai Yang, Yichao Shen, Zhiying Du, Zhaowei Zhang, Yu Deng, Li Zhao, Hao Zhao, Zongqing Lu, Oier Mees, Marc Pollefeys, Jiaolong Yang, Baining Guo
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15

$\mu_0$: A Scalable 3D Interaction-Trace World Model

arXiv:2606. 13769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: World models that capture how actions induce physical change enable scalable robot learning without reliance on embodiment-specific action labels.

By Seungjae Lee, Yoonkyo Jung, Jusuk Lee, Jonghun Shin, Amir Hossein Shahidzadeh, Yao-Chih Lee, H. Jin Kim, Jia-Bin Huang, Furong Huang
arXiv AI
Sep 16

World Models for Embodied Intelligence: From Plausible to Controllable to Actionable

arXiv:2609.16697v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: World models connect perception and decision-making in embodied intelligence by maintaining hidden state, anticipating consequences, comparing interv...

By Nanjie Yao, Hao Wang, Chong Cheng, Zhikang Chen, Wenzhe Li, Jiafei Lyu, Li Shen, Peilin Zhao, Zongqing Lu, Gao Huang, Steven Hoi, Dacheng Tao, Deheng Ye
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 15

PhysBrain 1.5: From Vision-Language Models to Physical Foundation Models

PhysBrain 1.5 is a unified vision‑language model that learns to understand physical environments, generate actions, and predict future states by encoding language, end‑effector motion, and dense visual targets as discrete sequences and training them with autoregressive next‑token prediction. The model is pre‑trained on human interaction videos and fine‑tuned on human demonstrations, robot trajectories, and simulated experience, achieving an average score of 72.5 across 28 embodied understanding benchmarks and outperforming other open‑source models on 14 of them. It also demonstrates the ability to produce end‑effector trajectories and predict future scenes with spatially aligned RGB, depth, and robot‑mask outputs.

By DeepCybo Team, Yu Bin, Haipeng Cao, Zheng Chang, Kai Chen, Youning Chen, Kailin Deng, Yichao Du, Xiaotong Fu, Haoyang Ge, Yunlong Guo, Chenliu Hao, Jiyan He, Xuguo He, Yakun Hou, Kai Hu, Cong Huang, Tuopusen Huang, Yu Huang, Hong Li, Peize Li, Shijie Lian, Xiaopeng Lin, Yun Lin, Haibao Liu, Haochen Liu, Qiuzhi Liu, Shengcai Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Tao Luo, Peng Ren, Shuo Ren, Chaoyi Ruan, Zhaolong Shen, Yukun Shi, Qiyuan Su, Yuxuan Tian, Yining Wang, Changti Wu, Hao Wu, Xueyin Xu, Ruoqi Yang, Zhaoyang Yang, Hang Yuan, Zhaoyang Zeng, Hanwen Zhang, Ruimeng Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yibo Zhang, Yuxiang Zhang, Zhirui Zhang, Ziyi Zhang, Zubin Zheng, Zishen Zhuang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
4d ago

EgoActionBench: Benchmarking Dense Action Captioning for Egocentric Human Videos

EgoActionBench is a new benchmark for dense action captioning in egocentric videos, featuring 1,407 episodes and 41,132 fine‑grained action annotations that specify which hand (left, right, or both) performs each temporally localized atomic action. The benchmark introduces an evaluation protocol that assesses semantic fidelity, temporal overlap, action precision, and recall, thereby measuring what happens, when it happens, and which hand is involved. Twenty baseline models were evaluated, and two backbones (Qwen3‑VL‑4B and LLaVA‑OneVision‑2‑8B) were fine‑tuned and reinforced, achieving significant score improvements and outperforming all open‑source baselines.