arXiv AI

Proactive Memory for Event-Driven LLM Agents

Proactive Memory for Event-Driven LLM Agents introduces ProactMem, a system that organizes an agent’s history into recent events, temporal trajectories, and behavioral regularities. It validates trajectory facts against source events and assesses regularities through historical replay before matching them to current conditions. The authors also present ProactiveStream, a longitudinal benchmark with three application scopes, and report that ProactMem achieves an overall F1 of 52.6%, a 21.4% relative improvement over the strongest of five external baselines.

arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago

Prospective Memory for Proactive LLM Agents

arXiv:2611.05731v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most memory systems for LLM agents are retrospective, preserving and retrieving past information to inform current decisions. Proactive agents, however...

By Yuanchen Bei, Zhining Liu, Tianxin Wei, Weizhi Zhang, Zhichen Zeng, Philip S. Yu, Hendrik Hamann, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong
arXiv AI
Oct 7

Understanding and Mitigating Inference-Time Overreliance Using Agentic Memory

The paper investigates how large language model agents can over-rely on agentic memory, a phenomenon where retrieved memories distort inference even when they are correctly stored and retrieved. It shows that memory is helpful when past experience fully transfers to the current task but becomes misleading under partial query-memory overlap, a pattern confirmed by controlled experiments. To address this, the authors propose MEMTRIM, a plug‑and‑play framework that indexes memory evidence at write time and limits its reuse at read time, thereby reducing over-reliance without retraining and preserving useful memory benefits across models and memory architectures.

By Luoxi Tang, Yuqiao Meng, Nilesh Auradkar, Muchao Ye, Dazheng Zhang, Zhaohan Xi
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

Temporal Evidence Forests for Long-Horizon Multi-Party Conversational Memory

The paper introduces T‑Mem, a memory framework that uses temporal structure to manage long‑horizon multi‑party conversations. It employs Temporal Evidence Discovery to find locally concentrated evidence, Temporal Memory Structuring to model state transitions and compress low‑information spans, and Evidence Forest Linearization to serialize the evidence for answer generation. Experiments on two benchmarks show that T‑Mem outperforms existing memory frameworks across various settings.

By Junyou Guo, Chongyang Tao, Yan He, Yong Wang, Shuai Ma
arXiv AI
Oct 5

DyadMem: A Long-Term Memory Benchmark of How Agents Work with Users

DyadMem introduces a new benchmark for evaluating how long‑term agents remember user‑specific relational information, called User‑conditioned Relational Agent Memory (URAM). The dataset contains 3,065 episodes, 50,961 sessions, and 61,210 QA pairs, with detailed annotations for memory capture, update, and recall across multi‑session trajectories. Experiments on 20 models show strong performance in a gold‑memory setting but a significant drop in full‑pipeline QA, highlighting gaps in current LLM memory capabilities.

By Yifei Tao, Xinyu Zhong, Henry Hengyuan Zhao, Fanyi Wang, Tengda Guo, Wentao Qiu, Ying Wang, Liujian Tang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

MemoProAgent: Toward Memory-Driven Proactive Assistance

MemoProAgent tackles memory‑driven proactive assistance by mining long‑horizon personal memories to decide when an assistant should intervene. The authors introduce MemoProBench, a benchmark pairing egocentric video with year‑long, distractor‑rich user memories and human‑verified trigger windows, and show that existing models perform poorly (≤15%). MemoProAgent uses a graph‑organized memory store and a lightweight RL stage to improve accuracy from <10% to 42.4% without training.

By Shenglai Zeng, Xiao Yang, Tiffany Ma, Xinyuan Zhang, Nanshu Wang, Deren Lei, Kai Sun, Xilun Chen, Tammy Stark, Xianhui Zhu, Yuetai Li, Rulin Shao, Tianxin Wei, Rakesh Wanga, Anuj Kumar, Jiliang Tang, Wen-tau Yih, Xin Luna Dong
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Beyond Static Summarization: Proactive Memory Extraction for LLM Agents

The paper "Beyond Static Summarization: Proactive Memory Extraction for LLM Agents" identifies two shortcomings in current memory extraction for large language model agents: (1) extraction occurs ahead of time and mixes multiple types of information, leading to loss of useful details, and (2) extraction is typically one‑off, allowing errors and hallucinations to persist. To address these issues, the authors propose ProMem, a proactive framework that separates details, events, and relations, applies distinct extraction strategies for each, checks for completeness, and verifies facts at an atomic level. Experiments demonstrate that ProMem enhances memory completeness and question‑answering accuracy while maintaining a favorable balance between quality and token cost.

By Chengyuan Yang, Zequn Sun, Wei Wei, Wei Hu