arXiv:2512. 22088v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The scaling law, a cornerstone of Large Language Model (LLM) development, predicts improvements in model performance with increasing computational resources.
By Chiwun Yang
arXiv:2607. 22757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce Graded Large Language Models (GLLMs), an algebraic framework that equips the representation space of a transformer with a grading and propagates the induced weighted scalar action through embeddings, self-attention, and the training objective.
By T. Shaska
arXiv:2607. 10848v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning for large language models (LLMs) typically relies on trust-region masks to stabilize off-policy updates.
By Xiangxin Zhou, Jiarui Yao, Penghui Qi, Bowen Ping, Jiaqi Tang, Haonan Wang, Tianyu Pang
arXiv:2605. 25085v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study the rate-distortion limits of online KV cache compression in autoregressive language models, formulating it as sequential Wyner-Ziv source coding on the filtration induced by the model, with the next-step query as decoder side information.
By Munsik Kim
arXiv:2512. 10656v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As context windows in large language models continue to expand, it is essential to characterize how attention behaves at extreme sequence lengths.
By L\'ea Bohbot, Cyril Letrouit, Gabriel Peyr\'e, Fran\c{c}ois-Xavier Vialard
arXiv:2606. 07559v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fine-tuning a language model often fails silently when its correct completion must outrank a near-synonym competitor.
By Vaibhav Prakash, Jayasri Dontabhaktuni
arXiv:2601. 05280v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: On the one hand, the question of whether large language models (LLMs) are Solomonoff induction estimators has become an explicit question at the intersection of Algorithmic Information Theory (AIT) and Machine Learning (ML) of great interest.
By Hector Zenil
arXiv:2607. 28667v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work has shown that classifying large language models (LLMs)' responses can be distinguished by modeling token embeddings as trajectories of a black-box dynamical system (DS) and comparing prediction residuals of two DSs.
By Mohamed Akrout, Dan Wilson
arXiv:2607. 23777v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The discovery of scaling laws has motivated training neural networks on ever increasing quantities of data.
By Anuj Apte
arXiv:2606. 30789v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a standard tool for improving the reasoning ability of large language models, yet its training dynamics are still described empirically: reward trajectories are fit with low-parameter functional forms whose constants carry no mechanistic meaning, and hyperparameter choices remain a matter of trial and error.
By Rajat Ghosh, Datta Nimmaturi, Aryan Singhal, Vaishnavi Bhargava, Henry Wong, Johnu George, Debojyoti Dutta
arXiv:2602. 22600v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Training selects for behavior, not circuitry: many weight configurations can implement the same function.
By Joshua S. Schiffman
arXiv:2603. 17019v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A central question in the debate over large language models is whether transformers can learn rules they have never seen, or whether they can only interpolate: predict new cases from their similarity to training examples.
By Andy Gray