arXiv:2608. 13883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most agent-memory benchmarks test post-hoc recall, whereas MemoryArena evaluates whether memory supports interdependent, multi-session task completion.
arXiv:2606. 29914v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent memory systems are increasingly evaluated against RAG and full-context baselines, but reported gains often mix changes in the memory method with changes in the language model, embedding model, or retrieval pipeline, making it unclear what is actually being measured.
The report audits a long‑term‑memory retrieval chain on 500 LongMemEval‑S development questions, evaluating reader performance under an adapted GPT‑4o rubric. Scores vary widely across reader lanes (93–479), with the strongest lanes scoring 479 and 475, and re‑judging the same pass‑1 answers changes three labels, yielding 478. Fixed‑answer knowledge‑update re‑scoring achieves 70/72 or 69/72 depending on the template, and a different‑family reader scores 474, just 1.0 percentage point below the headline pass. The study also reports that live reader request bodies were not retained, that 18 of 23 gains occurred where baseline packets lacked evidence, and that a negative control rejects a verifier that repairs some wrong drafts but breaks many correct ones. Overall, the findings do not establish a new leaderboard leader or a transferable memory advantage, and the released artifacts support packet inspection and re‑scoring but do not reconstruct the method.
The paper introduces MERIT, a benchmark that evaluates the marginal benefit of long‑term memory for tool‑using large language model agents while explicitly accounting for cost. MERIT provides episodic tool‑use tasks across three domains, verifies dependence on earlier‑episode facts, and measures memory operations in tokens and dollars. Experiments on GPT‑4.1‑mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 5 show that memory can significantly improve task success, but its utility varies widely across models and memory implementations, and full replay is rarely cost‑effective.
arXiv:2606. 09900v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory is the missing layer for LLM agents: across sessions they forget, and the common workaround -- replaying the whole history into the prompt -- is expensive, slow, and, as distractors accumulate, less accurate.
DyadMem introduces a new benchmark for evaluating how long‑term agents remember user‑specific relational information, called User‑conditioned Relational Agent Memory (URAM). The dataset contains 3,065 episodes, 50,961 sessions, and 61,210 QA pairs, with detailed annotations for memory capture, update, and recall across multi‑session trajectories. Experiments on 20 models show strong performance in a gold‑memory setting but a significant drop in full‑pipeline QA, highlighting gaps in current LLM memory capabilities.
arXiv:2609.38021v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We evaluate an auditable long-term memory system on LongMemEval-S. Its retrieval chain uses hybrid candidate retrieval, cross-encoder reranking, cove...
arXiv:2606. 26806v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-running language agents need more than memory access.
arXiv:2608. 12365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For fifty years, data systems have answered two questions.
The paper introduces JointCoreBench, a benchmark for evaluating memory selection in large language model agents, and JointCore, a cost‑ordered group‑deletion baseline that identifies minimal sufficient memory subsets. JointCore achieves perfect recovery of minimum‑cost sufficient sets across 6,912 conditions, cuts subset evaluations by 62.9%, and saves 87.8% of active memory usage. Experiments across multiple model families and tasks demonstrate that JointCore preserves full‑memory behavior while reducing model queries and cost‑aware recovery rates compared to singleton deletion.
The paper presents a retrieval‑admissibility verification framework for long‑term memory agents, classifying each memory‑query pair as admissible, inadmissible, or unresolved. It evaluates the framework on public benchmarks (RHELM and MemOps), showing improved anchor recall and reduced exact similarity errors, while also revealing that existing verifiers miss certain inadmissible exposures. The study highlights the need for separate checks on candidate support, admissibility, prompt exposure, and answer disclosure to ensure safe memory retrieval.
arXiv:2606. 01138v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agent-memory frameworks -- mem0, Letta/MemGPT, Cognee, Zep/Graphiti, MemoryOS, MemTensor -- each ship their own SDK, storage layout, and operational vocabulary.