ReasonAudio is a new benchmark designed to evaluate reasoning capabilities in text‑audio retrieval, addressing the gap left by existing semantic‑matching focused datasets. It tests four logical abilities—negation, temporal order, sound co‑occurrence, and sound duration—across five synthetic subtasks (1,000 queries over 10,000 composite clips) and one natural subtask (100 queries over 1,000 real‑world clips). Evaluation of 11 state‑of‑the‑art systems shows significant limitations, with the best model, OmniEmbed‑7B, scoring only 20.7 overall and 53.8% in a controlled setting, compared to 70.6% for its generative backbone and 95.6% for humans.
By Honglei Zhang, Yuting Chen, Chenpeng Hu, Pengfei Zhou, Siyue Zhang, Yilei Shi
The paper introduces TORUS, a closed‑loop benchmark designed to evaluate unified audio models on their ability to understand the audio they generate or edit. TORUS contains 1,053 questions across 21 tasks and 8 audio domain settings, covering all three audio types. The authors evaluate both unified models and cascades of specialized models, finding that the best unified models answer only about 52.4% of questions about their own outputs, while GPT‑Audio achieves 53.6%.
By Aryan Vijay Bhosale, Harshit Rajgarhia, Abhishek Mukherji, Dinesh Manocha
arXiv:2610.07338v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Audio benchmarks are built around short, pre-segmented clips, limiting model design to brief inputs or fixed vocabularies. To close this gap, we intr...
By Kwanghee Choi, Suwon Shon, Dmitriy Serdyuk, Guitang Lan, Chao-Wei Huang, Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli, Sangeeta Srivastava, Zhaojiang Lin, Saurabh Adya, Ming Sun
arXiv:2510.11454v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Recent advancements in large multimodal models (LMMs) have shown strong capabilities in audio understanding. However, most systems rely solel...
By Kuan-Yi Lee, Tsung-En Lin, Hung-Yi Lee
arXiv:2605.07593v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Real-world audio-visual understanding requires chaining evidence that is sparse, temporally dispersed, and split across the visual and auditory str...
By Hengyi Feng, Hao Liang, Mingrui Chen, Bohan Zeng, Meiyi Qiang, Zhengyang Zhao, Zimo Meng, Zeang Sheng, Wentao Zhang
arXiv:2509. 22363v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) integrate audio encoders with pretrained Large Language Models to perform complex multimodal reasoning tasks.
By Pooneh Mousavi, Lovenya Jain, Mirco Ravanelli, Cem Subakan
arXiv:2609.27389v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Audio language models understand what is said far better than how it sounds. Closing this gap takes more than data. Detailed acoustic annotation is c...
By Yuxiang Wang, Shengbo Cai, Yingda Shen, Ming-Hao Hsu, Qinke Ni, Liqiang Zhang, Teddy Sun, Steve Yevs, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv:2608. 16539v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have made rapid progress on standardized benchmarks, yet their deployment in practical media workflows, curation, archival indexing, and content distribution remains largely unrealized.
By Tony Alex, Wish Suharitdamrong, Sara Atito, Armin Mustafa, Muhammad Awais, Philip J. B. Jackson, Jiankang Deng, Ismail Elezi
arXiv:2606. 14591v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have shown strong performance on a wide range of audio understanding tasks, yet they still struggle with complex audio reasoning.
By Hui Geng, Yi Su, Han Yin, Tianjiao Wan, Qisheng Xu, Jiaxin Chen, Zijian Gao, Hengzhu Liu, Xie Chen, Kele Xu
Qwen-Audio-Jev extends Qwen-Audio-3.1-ASR-Flash-Next with a dedicated decision head that unifies selection, binary judgment, and scoring into three primitives: CHOICE, NOUL, and SCORE. The model delivers competitive accuracies and error rates across 18 labeled configurations, achieving 78.70% on MMAU-mini, 84.06% on MMSU, 6.50% equal error rate on VoxCeleb1-O, and a 0.1062 normalized MAE on NISQA. Compared to its predecessor, Qwen-Audio-Jev offers roughly a 20‑fold inference speedup, enabling efficient high‑throughput audio decision‑making for tasks such as large‑scale screening, speaker verification, and automated quality assessment.
By Ying Fang, Zhifu Gao, Qing Gu, Jiajun He, Kangqi Jing, Xiangang Li, Yu Pu, Wupeng Wang
arXiv:2606. 11260v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Humans process rich auditory environments through tightly integrated cognitive capabilities such as audio perception, audio reasoning, and memory.
By Hongyu Jin, Siyi Wang, Yang Xiao, Jiaheng Dong, Shihong Tan, Kaiyuan peng, Georgiana Juravle, Shanquan Chen, Gongping Huang, Hong Jia, Eun-Jung Holden, James Bailey, Ting Dang
arXiv:2608.22236v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large audio-language models (LALMs) have shown promising progress in understanding speech, music, and general sound events, yet their ability...
By Yize Li, Ningyuan Yang, Sile Yin, Sindhuja Thogarrati, Sung-En Chang, Andrew C. Singer, Xue Lin, Chuan-Che Huang, Shuo Zhang