← Back to all news
arXiv Computation and Language

Exact Feedback Is Not Control: Evaluating Text-based Closed-Loop Revision in LLMs

The paper introduces a fixed‑budget revision protocol that uses deterministic verifiers to expose all remaining violations across exact‑length, lexical, and compositional constraints, thereby isolating model‑side revision behavior. Experiments on 19 open‑ and closed‑source LLMs show wide variability in controller‑level success, with some models achieving up to 99.8% success while others remain below 20%. Controlled studies reveal that post‑training and scale affect model responses to exact feedback, but do not consistently improve exact correction, and that recurrence of earlier outputs is linked to lower recoverability.

Related stories

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

Draft-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Speculative Draft Models

Draft-OPD introduces an on‑policy distillation method for speculative draft models, addressing the mismatch between supervised fine‑tuning and inference by letting the target model supervise the drafter on draft‑induced states. The approach uses target‑assisted rollouts for stable continuations and replays drafting from error positions exposed during verification, enabling the drafter to learn from both accepted and rejected proposals. Experiments demonstrate that Draft‑OPD achieves more than five‑fold lossless acceleration across diverse tasks, outperforming prior draft models such as EAGLE‑3 and DFlash by 23 % and 13 % respectively.

By Haodi Lei, Yafu Li, Haoran Zhang, Shunkai Zhang, Qianjia Cheng, Xiaoye Qu, Ganqu Cui, Bowen Zhou, Ning Ding, Yun Luo, Yu Cheng
llmsfine-tuningefficiency
More like this →
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

User Feedback Provides a Unique Signal that LLMs Can not Detect

The paper argues that user feedback from real interactions is a valuable learning signal for Large Language Models (LLMs), contrary to recent claims that it is too noisy to use. By creating synthetic data with a clear ground truth and testing on naturalistic data, the authors show that revisions guided by user feedback fix targeted issues more often than baseline revisions. They further reveal that current evaluation methods bias against feedback‑driven improvements, as judges tend to overlook genuinely corrected responses and favor inferior baselines.

By Shachar Don-Yehiya, Leshem Choshen, Omri Abend
llmssafety
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 21

Complex Problem Solving in Large Language Models: A Statistical Control Survey and Diagnostic Framework

arXiv:2609.20973v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Complex problem solving (CPS) with large language models (LLMs) is often framed as a matter of stronger reasoning or longer generation. Yet early-ste...

By Jiazhang Cai, Tao Wang, Ruidong Zhang, Siyuan Li, Terry Ma, Luyang Fang, Haoran Lu, Huimin Cheng, Yingchuan Zhang, Shushan Wu, Rui Xie, Lin Tang, Chao Huang, Rongjie Liu, Ziyu Liu, Meizhi Yu, Yongkai Chen, Yifan Zhou, Zeliang Sun, Chang Liu, Zhen Xiang, Wei Xiao, Zixin Rao, Xinyi Liu, Yutong Hu, Mengrui Zhang, Jing Zhang, Weidi Luo, Jincheng Yu, Zhengliang Liu, Weihang You, Hanqi Jiang, Yi Pan, Junhao Chen, Xinliang Li, Tianming Liu, Wenxuan Zhong, Ping Ma
llmssafety
More like this →
arXiv AI
Oct 27

StateWise: Teaching Language Models to Track and Obey Evolving Constraints in Multi-Turn Dialogue

StateWise is a method that trains a single large language model to maintain and update its own constraint state during multi‑turn dialogue. By fine‑tuning the model to summarize conversations into a typed state with tombstones for revoked constraints and then self‑training on trajectories that pass exact round‑trip checks, it reduces relapse and improves conversation success. The approach outperforms a compiled‑ledger baseline on relapse without requiring inference‑time scaffolding, and it is evaluated on two backbones with held‑out constraint families and unseen phrasings.

By Samarth Varshney, Ritu Yadav
llmsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 24

Agent-Editing World Model: Rethinking World Modeling for LLM Agents

The paper introduces the Agent-Editing World Model (AEWM), a new approach that models how reasoning and actions influence future task progress instead of simulating tool responses. AEWM includes an Action Judge that classifies decisions as Critical, Exploratory, or Noisy, and a State Revision mechanism that edits noisy reasoning–action continuations from the same observed history. The integrated system, EditAct, directly updates the underlying state during real execution, leading to significant performance gains across multiple benchmarks and agent backbones.

By Shuang Sun, Guoxin Chen, Fanzhe Meng, Jia Deng, Huatong Song, Jinhao Jiang, Wayne Xin Zhao, Hongteng Xu, Ji-Rong Wen
llmsagentsfine-tuningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 23

Why Constrained Updates Still Forget: A Functional-Path Analysis of Continual SFT

The paper investigates why constrained updates in supervised fine‑tuning (SFT) still lead to forgetting by developing a functional‑path analysis that decomposes changes in old loss into controlled direction, gradient staleness, probe mismatch, and finite‑step effects. It introduces a conditional refresh budget and identifies a restoring direction provided by informative replay, showing that the placement of constraints relative to Adam and the granularity of constraints significantly affect retention across code‑label audits. The study also explores checkpointed generation, replay schedules, and sequential‑task comparisons, demonstrating that subspace regularization, projection, and supervised replay differentially influence backward transfer and content retention.

By Qingsen Ma, Dianyun Wang, Jiahong Liu, Irwin King
llmsfine-tuning
More like this →