arXiv:2606. 19266v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The development of large language models (LLMs) has led to an increased focus on their adaptation to specialized domains and languages, yet the effectiveness of domain adaptation strategies remains unclear.
arXiv:2608.00207v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) perform strongly in English medical tasks but degrade substantially in Arabic, a gap widely attributed to limited trai...
arXiv:2511.00421v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in medical applications, but their ability to detect and correct errors in clinical texts remains u...
LuxIT is a monolingual instruction‑tuning dataset for Luxembourgish, created by synthesizing instruction‑answer pairs from native texts using the DeepSeek‑R1‑0528 model and a quality‑assurance LLM‑as‑judge process. The resulting 227,507 high‑quality pairs were used to fine‑tune 14 LLMs (≤15 B parameters), yielding an average accuracy increase of +5.37 percentage points on standardized Luxembourgish proficiency exams and improvements in macro‑averaged F1 on nine of the fourteen downstream NLP tasks. These findings demonstrate that synthetic monolingual data can effectively enhance LLM performance in low‑resource languages and reveal the complex relationship between exam performance and practical NLP gains.
The paper examines how multilingual medical adaptation affects the internal representations of Whisper ASR models by performing layer‑wise encoder analysis. It compares several adaptation strategies—zero‑shot decoding, English‑only fine‑tuning, German‑only diagnostic fine‑tuning, two‑stage EN→EN+DE continuation, and direct EN+DE fine‑tuning—across different Whisper sizes, finding that fine‑tuning improves performance but the best model varies by setting. Layer‑wise results show that English medical fine‑tuning drives the main encoder shift, while multilingual continuation largely preserves the adapted representation space, with domain and language information remaining recoverable across layers. "whyItMatters":"The study provides insight into how multilingual medical adaptation reshapes Whisper’s internal representations, guiding the selection of model sizes and fine‑tuning strategies for improved MedASR performance."
The paper examines how multilingual medical adaptation affects the internal representations of Whisper ASR models. By comparing various fine‑tuning strategies—zero‑shot decoding, English‑only, German‑only, two‑stage EN→EN+DE, and direct EN+DE fine‑tuning—it shows that fine‑tuning significantly improves performance, with the best model varying by setting. Layer‑wise encoder analysis reveals that English medical fine‑tuning drives the main representation shift, while multilingual continuation largely preserves the adapted space, and that domain and language signals remain recoverable across layers.
MedProb is a lightweight probing framework that predicts multiple-choice medical visual question answering (Med‑VQA) answers directly from frozen vision‑language model (VLM) representations, avoiding free‑text generation. On datasets such as PATH‑VQA, SLAKE, and VQA‑RAD, MedProb extracts more answer‑relevant signal than prompting and outperforms both medical VLMs and agentic systems. The approach also narrows the performance gap between small and large models, shows that medical adaptation does not consistently improve linear decodability, and reveals positional biases in both prompting and generation.
arXiv:2606. 05510v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Telehealth systems have become increasingly important for delivering accessible and timely medical information.
The paper investigates how large language models handle domain-specific jargon, comparing a general-purpose Llama‑3.1 with a version fine‑tuned on medical data. Two new medical jargon benchmarks reveal that the general model actually outperforms the fine‑tuned variant, and interpretability tools show the fine‑tuned model over‑emphasizes a few components linked to jargon predictions. Reweighting these components narrows the performance gap, and some jargon‑sensitive components also aid materials‑science tasks, indicating a partially domain‑agnostic representation of specialized terminology.
arXiv:2608.30609v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly capable in general, but their utility can remain modest in niche or understudied areas. One approach to addres...
arXiv:2608.22363v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical visual question answering (VQA) is a crucial task in clinical AI, yet its evaluation has so far centered almost exclusively on English, limitin...
The paper presents a unified evaluation of cross‑lingual consistency (CLC) enhancement methods for multilingual language models, covering inference‑time interventions and post‑training approaches across three model families and three closed‑form benchmarks. Results indicate that post‑training methods, especially direct distribution alignment, consistently improve CLC across all model‑dataset combinations, while other methods are more sensitive to answer format and language coverage. The study also examines the impact of CLC enhancement on culturally diverse question answering, finding no systematic degradation in controlled settings but occasional accuracy drops in open‑ended generation, particularly for non‑English responses.
arXiv:2609.14825v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are often deemed unsafe for clinical question answering because of their tendency to hallucinate. Retrieval augmentation...