arXiv:2608.30297v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Attributes describing data content and context can induce diverse imbalance patterns that go beyond label imbalance alone. However, existing studies pr...
By Hanshu Rao, Guangzeng Han, Xiaolei Huang
The paper introduces ROME, a framework that learns latent group structure while optimizing worst-group predictive performance. ROME links latent-variable modeling with distributionally robust optimization through an Expectation-Maximization approach for linear models and a neural Mixture-of-Experts for nonlinear settings. Experiments on simulations and three real-world regression datasets show that ROME improves worst-group performance while maintaining competitive overall accuracy compared to existing group-aware and group-label-free robust learning methods.
By Siqi Li, Molei Liu, Yiwei Lyu, Ziye Tian, Chuan Hong, Nan Liu
arXiv:2606.23609v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Machine learning models exploit spurious correlations, achieving high average accuracy but failing disproportionately on underrepresented sub...
By Ankur Garg, Ulrich A\"ivodji, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Vincent Michalski
The paper proposes a fairness-aware Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that tackles routing-induced bias by applying subgroup reweighting to correct data imbalance and gate entropy regularization to prevent the gating network from collapsing onto subgroup attributes. This end-to-end approach keeps expert utilization balanced and interpretable, offering a clear view of how subgroups are allocated across experts. Experiments show that the method improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance.
By Sunhee Hwang
Machine learning models exploit spurious correlations, achieving high average accuracy but failing disproportionately on underrepresented subgroups. Existing methods address this by adjusting network parameters, guided either by subgroup annotations or inferred pseudo-group labels.
arXiv:2501. 02211v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) reproduce homogeneity bias -- the tendency to portray marginalized groups as more internally similar than dominant groups -- but whether this bias is stable or an artifact of inference settings has only been studied in single proprietary models.
By Messi H. J. Lee
The paper presents a formal framework for majority‑minority learning tasks, demonstrating that standard gradient‑descent training can amplify bias by favoring majority groups and producing stereotypical predictors that ignore minority‑specific features. It identifies three key theoretical findings: the close proximity between full‑data and stereotypical predictors, the dominance of a region where training the entire model mainly captures majority traits, and a lower bound on the extra training needed to mitigate this effect. Experiments on deep learning for tabular and image classification illustrate these results.
By Fran\c{c}ois Bachoc (LPP), J\'er\^ome Bolte (TSE-R), Ryan Boustany (TSE-R), Jean-Michel Loubes (IMT, REGALIA)
arXiv:2607. 06930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Missing data is prevalent in practical applications, making effective imputation an essential preprocessing step for downstream analysis.
By Chuyao Zhang, E Li, Taochen Chen, Yiqun Zhang, Yuzhu Ji, Shuping Zhao, Peng Liu, Yiu-ming Cheung
The paper evaluates three open‑weight large language models—Gemma3‑12B (USA), Bielik‑11B‑v3 (Poland), and Qwen3‑4B (China)—against World Values Survey data for 63 demographic personas across three countries, using normalized Wasserstein distance to measure cultural misalignment. Surprisingly, none of the models shows a preference for its home country; Qwen3‑4B, built in China, has the highest misalignment for Chinese respondents. Targeted LoRA fine‑tuning on the five worst‑case personas, with fewer than 1,200 training pairs and under 15 minutes on a single GPU, reduces bias by 16.8% for Bielik‑11B, but the fine‑tuning redistributes bias rather than eliminating it, shifting worst‑case personas from American to Chinese elderly.
By Antoni Czolgowski, Abel Iyasele
The paper investigates intersectional biases in multimodal clinical predictions using Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR). It introduces datasets MIMIC-Eye1 and MIMIC-IV ED, applies unified text representations from pre‑trained clinical language models, and benchmarks bias mitigation at the intersectional subgroup level. Results show that subgroup‑specific mitigation is robust across datasets, subgroups, and embeddings, effectively addressing intersectional biases in multimodal settings.
By Ayaazuddin Mohammad, Kishore Sampath, Resmi Ramachandranpillai
arXiv:2609.24556v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) minimises aggregate reconstruction error, which can inadvertently represent majority subgroups with substantially...
By Arjun KM, Shashi Jain
arXiv:2607. 28319v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This work presents Fairness Pruning, a lightweight structural intervention method designed for the management and future mitigation of demographic bias in large language models (LLMs).
By Pere Martra, Eugenio Mart\'inez C\'amara, Alfonso Ure\~na L\'opez