arXiv AI

When does Subgroup Balance Matter? Predicting Performance Sensitivity from Latent Separability

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 21

Robust Mixture Models for Algorithmic Fairness Under Latent Heterogeneity

The paper introduces ROME, a framework that learns latent group structure while optimizing worst-group predictive performance. ROME links latent-variable modeling with distributionally robust optimization through an Expectation-Maximization approach for linear models and a neural Mixture-of-Experts for nonlinear settings. Experiments on simulations and three real-world regression datasets show that ROME improves worst-group performance while maintaining competitive overall accuracy compared to existing group-aware and group-label-free robust learning methods.

By Siqi Li, Molei Liu, Yiwei Lyu, Ziye Tian, Chuan Hong, Nan Liu
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Fairness-Aware Mixture-of-Experts via Subgroup Reweighting and Gate Regularization

The paper proposes a fairness-aware Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that tackles routing-induced bias by applying subgroup reweighting to correct data imbalance and gate entropy regularization to prevent the gating network from collapsing onto subgroup attributes. This end-to-end approach keeps expert utilization balanced and interpretable, offering a clear view of how subgroups are allocated across experts. Experiments show that the method improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance.

By Sunhee Hwang
arXiv AI
Sep 16

When majority rules, minority loses: bias amplification of gradient descent

The paper presents a formal framework for majority‑minority learning tasks, demonstrating that standard gradient‑descent training can amplify bias by favoring majority groups and producing stereotypical predictors that ignore minority‑specific features. It identifies three key theoretical findings: the close proximity between full‑data and stereotypical predictors, the dominance of a region where training the entire model mainly captures majority traits, and a lower bound on the extra training needed to mitigate this effect. Experiments on deep learning for tabular and image classification illustrate these results.

By Fran\c{c}ois Bachoc (LPP), J\'er\^ome Bolte (TSE-R), Ryan Boustany (TSE-R), Jean-Michel Loubes (IMT, REGALIA)
arXiv AI
Sep 7

Cultural Misalignment in Large Language Models: Detection, Measurement, and Mitigation Through Targeted Fine-Tuning

The paper evaluates three open‑weight large language models—Gemma3‑12B (USA), Bielik‑11B‑v3 (Poland), and Qwen3‑4B (China)—against World Values Survey data for 63 demographic personas across three countries, using normalized Wasserstein distance to measure cultural misalignment. Surprisingly, none of the models shows a preference for its home country; Qwen3‑4B, built in China, has the highest misalignment for Chinese respondents. Targeted LoRA fine‑tuning on the five worst‑case personas, with fewer than 1,200 training pairs and under 15 minutes on a single GPU, reduces bias by 16.8% for Bielik‑11B, but the fine‑tuning redistributes bias rather than eliminating it, shifting worst‑case personas from American to Chinese elderly.

By Antoni Czolgowski, Abel Iyasele
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Fairness at Every Intersection: Uncovering and Mitigating Intersectional Biases in Multimodal Clinical Predictions

The paper investigates intersectional biases in multimodal clinical predictions using Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR). It introduces datasets MIMIC-Eye1 and MIMIC-IV ED, applies unified text representations from pre‑trained clinical language models, and benchmarks bias mitigation at the intersectional subgroup level. Results show that subgroup‑specific mitigation is robust across datasets, subgroups, and embeddings, effectively addressing intersectional biases in multimodal settings.

By Ayaazuddin Mohammad, Kishore Sampath, Resmi Ramachandranpillai