arXiv:2602. 23135v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Edge classification on directed dynamic graphs requires modeling interactions between source and destination nodes exhibiting asymmetrical behavioral patterns and temporal dynamics.
By Tyler Bonnet, Marek Rei
arXiv:2610.19364v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Dynamic graph learning models how entities and their relations evolve from historical observations to predict future graph states. Existing methods do...
By Bo Li, Yue Yang, Yujin Huang, Siao Liu, David Lemphers, Sara E Rodriguez Gomez, Luke Borgnolo, Can Wang, Xin Zheng
arXiv:2607. 18412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dynamic graph learning aims to capture evolving structural and semantic patterns in real-world systems, such as fraud detection and recommender systems.
By Huizhe Zhang, Yuchang Zhu, Huazhen Zhong, Liang Chen, Zibin Zheng
arXiv:2607. 20737v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph Neural Networks trained on heterogenous bipartite graphs form a common basis in recommendation systems.
By Parul Maheshwari, Amulya Paruchuri, Yiqing Zou, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Farhad Farahani, Prakhar Mehrotra
arXiv:2601. 02366v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph-based recommendation has achieved great success in recent years.
By Yiwen Chen, Yiqing Wu, Huishi Luo, Fuzhen Zhuang, Deqing Wang, Zhao Zhang
arXiv:2510. 09416v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Learning on temporal graphs has become a central topic in graph representation learning, with numerous benchmarks indicating the strong performance of state-of-the-art models.
By Abigail J. Hayes, Tobias Schumacher, Markus Strohmaier
TTGBench is a new benchmark for temporal graph learning that evaluates both structural evolution and semantic drift in text‑attributed graphs. It includes six real‑world, text‑rich datasets with dual volatility and supports multi‑class and multi‑label temporal node classification, addressing gaps left by existing benchmarks. A comprehensive evaluation of 17 state‑of‑the‑art methods shows a clear divide: TGNNs excel at structural prediction but struggle with semantic tracking, while LLM‑based models perform better on semantic tasks but lag in structural prediction.
By Longfei Ma, Zemin Liu, Fei Wu
arXiv:2602. 14239v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting links in sparse, continuously evolving networks is a central challenge in network science.
By Nafiseh Sadat Sajadi, Behnam Bahrak, Mahdi Jafari Siavoshani
arXiv:2610.17582v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Entities in real-world systems often evolve over time: users shift between information consumption patterns, researchers migrate between fields, and...
By Junghoon Kim, Seungyoon Choi, Hyunsung Kim, Chanyoung Park
The paper investigates whether temporal link predictors can forgo learned node representations in favor of simple statistical counts of interaction patterns. It introduces a predictor that aggregates transition and co‑occurrence counts, smooths them with destination frequencies or Kneser‑Ney continuation counts, and combines these with popularity, source history, and recency via a shared log‑linear rule. With only 9–13 learned parameters, the model achieves the best mean reciprocal rank on 7 of 16 datasets and outperforms several baselines across all evaluated datasets, demonstrating that a lightweight, count‑based approach can rival more complex neural methods.
arXiv:2607. 03097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks (HGNNs) have exhibited remarkable efficacy in modeling complex systems with multiple types of nodes and relations, yet their training on large-scale heterogeneous graphs remains computationally prohibitive.
By Fuyan Ou, Yulin Hu, Ye Yuan
arXiv:2607. 25471v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) have each advanced recommendation systems by modeling structural and semantic signals, respectively.
By He Ma, Chen Liu