Concept erasure aims to remove a target concept from a representation while preserving the other information encoded in it. This is difficult because representations encode many concepts that are often correlated with the erasure target, so removing the target risks damaging them.
Training-free concept erasure is an attractive mechanism for controlling text-to-image diffusion models, but precise erasure often comes at the cost of damaging semantically related non-target concepts. Existing value-space methods remove the component of each cross-attention value along the target concept direction, implicitly treating target identity and shared visual structure as the same signal.
arXiv:2607. 23492v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Concept erasure techniques (CETs) edit text-to-image diffusion models to erase undesired targets such as NSFW content or copyrighted styles, while preserving model utility on benign concepts.
By Shaswati Saha, Rajasekhar Anguluri, Manas Gaur
arXiv:2607. 08337v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion unlearning is essential for mitigating the generation of harmful or copyrighted content in text-to-image models.
By Siyuan Wen, Jiahao Zeng, Ningning Ding
arXiv:2606. 06320v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model while preserving its general capabilities.
By Gizem Y\"uce, Giorgos Nikolaou, Nicolas Flammarion
Diffusion unlearning is essential for mitigating the generation of harmful or copyrighted content in text-to-image models. Current diffusion unlearning techniques determine the model update direction by either using alternatives of the target concept as an anchor or using empty prompts.
arXiv:2512. 07355v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Two traditions of interpretability have evolved side by side but seldom spoken to each other: Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), which prescribe what a concept should be, and Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), which discover what concepts emerge.
By Alexandre Rocchi, Thomas Fel, Gianni Franchi
arXiv:2607. 09236v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning in LLMs is the targeted removal of specific knowledge while preserving all other capabilities, critical for privacy and safety.
By Amit Peleg, Naman Deep Singh, Naama Pearl, Bibhabasu Mohapatra, Matthias Hein
arXiv:2606. 09859v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: MLLMs frequently hallucinate objects inconsistent with visual inputs.
By Yingxuan Zhuang, Jingxiao Yang, Miao Pan, Cheng Tan, Yuxiang Cai, Siwei Tan, Chen Zhi, Xuhong Zhang, Jianwei Yin, Jintao Chen
arXiv:2511. 05865v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advancements in large-scale generative models have enabled the creation of high-quality images and videos, but have also raised significant safety concerns regarding the generation of unsafe content.
By Viet Nguyen, Vishal M. Patel
arXiv:2507. 07754v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine unlearning is usually evaluated by what the classifier outputs: forget-set accuracy, confidence, membership-inference scores.
By Jaeheun Jung, Bosung Jung, Suhyun Bae, Donghun Lee
arXiv:2508. 17092v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Knowledge Tracing (KT) aims to predict a student's future performance based on their sequence of interactions with learning content.
By Yahya Badran, Christine Preisach