arXiv:2607. 03126v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Outcome-supervised reinforcement learning scales to verifiable reasoning tasks, but trajectory-level rewards assign the same outcome signal to all sampled tokens, overlooking their unequal contributions to the reasoning process.
By Zijun Xie, Yuyang You, Yongzhi Li, Enlei Gong, Quan Chen, Yanhua Cheng, Peng Jiang, Binbin Zheng, Xiaolong Liu, Zeyu Chen, Yadong Mu
arXiv:2606. 31575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a powerful tool for propelling Large Language Models (LLMs) beyond imitation-based training towards more robust reasoning capabilities.
By Outongyi Lv, Yanzhao Zheng, Yuanwei Zhang, Zhenghao Huang, Xingjun Wang, Baohua Dong, Hangcheng Zhu, Yingda Chen
arXiv:2605. 12969v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is one of the most widely adopted RLVR algorithms for post-training large language models on reasoning tasks.
By Feng Zhang, Xinhong Ma, Ziqiang Dong, Xi Leng, Jianfei Zhao, Xin Sun, Yang Yang, Guanjun Jiang
arXiv:2606. 12384v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in agentic Reinforcement Learning (RL) have substantially improved the multi-turn tool-use capabilities of large language model agents.
By Xucong Wang, Ziyu Ma, Yong Wang, Yuxiang Ji, Shidong Yang, Guanhua Chen, Pengkun Wang, Xiangxiang Chu
arXiv:2609.40360v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet their predictions...
By Junshu Pan, Zhizhang Fu, Shulin Huang, Yiran Ding, Zifan Cheng, Wenqi Shao, Qiaosheng Zhang, Yue Zhang
arXiv:2606. 25451v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Estimating token-level advantages in reinforcement learning (RL) for language models remains challenging because scaling up episodic experience collection is expensive.
By Fengdi Che, Yang Liu, Lei Yu, Meng Cao, Tong Che, Rupam Mahmood, Dale Schuurmans
arXiv:2606. 16154v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves language-model reasoning, but GRPO-style optimization remains prone to collapse.
By Prasanth YSS, Zhichen Ren, Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Ilan Gofman, Yuqi Chen, Zhaoyan Liu, Guangwei Yu, Jesse C. Cresswell, Satya Krishna Gorti
HISPO introduces a segment‑level policy‑optimization technique for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, creating entropy‑derived contiguous segments during rollout and applying clipped importance‑sampling correction at this granularity. It bridges the gap between token‑level and sequence‑level corrections, offering a middle‑ground approach for credit assignment in long‑form mathematical reasoning. Evaluated on Qwen3‑1.7B‑Base across six benchmarks, HISPO consistently outperforms or matches the strongest baselines in Pass@8 and Acc@8 metrics, notably improving AIME25 scores over GRPO and GSPO.
By Quoc-Vinh Lai-Dang, Hyo-Sang Shin
arXiv:2607. 07976v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved remarkable success in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
By Xiuyi Lou, Zicheng Xu, Yu-Neng Chuang, Hoang Anh Duy Le, Zhaozhuo Xu, Guanchu Wang, Vladimir Braverman
arXiv:2606. 03937v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While token-level entropy is commonly recognized as effective for credit assignment in text-only reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), it remains unclear whether this mechanism still holds in visual reasoning.
By Senjie Jin, Peixin Wang, Boyang Liu, Xiaoran Fan, Shuo Li, Zhiheng Xi, Jiazheng Zhang, Yuhao Zhou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
arXiv:2606. 19236v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards algorithms like GRPO have emerged as the dominant post-training paradigm for complex reasoning in LLMs, yet commonly suffer from policy entropy collapse during training.
By Haipeng Luo, Qingfeng Sun, Songli Wu, Can Xu, Wenfeng Deng, Han Hu, Yansong Tang
Contrastive Branch Policy Optimization (CBPO) is a reinforcement learning method that separates the allocation of a fixed rollout budget from the translation of branch outcomes into token-level credit. It uses generation entropy to screen branch positions, path- and node-level decay to distribute the budget, and Contrastive Branch Value (CBV) to estimate local decision sensitivity without changing reward signs. CBPO partitions trajectories into non-overlapping credit segments, preventing duplicated gradients and enabling fine-grained credit assignment using only outcome rewards.
By Ying Wang, Changlin Qiu, Bang Lin, Linbo Jin, Wen Jiang, Zhe Sun, Jingli Yang