arXiv:2608. 19491v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most modern optimizers form their momentum as an exponential moving average (EMA) of past gradients, forgetting every direction at one fixed rate.
By Euijin Hong, Guannan Qu
The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.
By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
The paper identifies a problem called Gradient-Update Mismatch (GUM), where optimizers can alter conflict-free gradient directions produced by gradient surgery, leading to conflicts between physics residual and boundary condition losses in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). To address this, the authors propose Gradient-Update Alignment (GUA), which projects the optimizer’s update onto the conflict-free cone and adjusts internal optimizer state accordingly. Experiments show GUM is common across many optimizers, and GUA consistently eliminates conflicts and significantly reduces error in PINN training.
By Jing Xiao, Xinhai Chen, Qinglin Wang, Menghan Jia, Zhiquan Lai, Dongsheng Li, Jie Liu, Tiejun Li
The paper introduces the Drift Contract, a spectral update geometry for local learning that improves depth robustness and hyperparameter stability. By applying momentum orthogonalization with spectral step scaling to per‑layer updates, the authors achieve consistent performance across a wide range of widths and depths on CIFAR‑10 MLPs, outperforming local Adam and providing a per‑layer, input‑conditioned drift bound. The study also shows that the spectral geometry itself, rather than step‑size rules, drives the observed depth robustness, while a negative result indicates that the stability benefit is limited to non‑normalized layers.
By Fabien Polly
arXiv:2606. 17526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Efficient optimization is essential for training large language models.
By Da Chang, Ganzhao Yuan
The paper investigates how different optimizers acquire distinct generalizing relations in single‑hidden‑layer ReLU networks. By manipulating nuisance‑connected weights and performing a strict‑parity sweep, the authors show that training conditions reshape both shared failures and relative optimizer advantages, with specific interventions improving accuracy on hard stages. The study also compares optimizer behavior across tasks and an external architecture (CIFAR‑10).
By Gongyue Zhang, Honghai Liu
arXiv:2608. 04407v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory-efficient matrix optimizers such as Sinkhorn gradient descent remove most AdamW optimizer state for dense Transformer matrices, but direct application to Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) training is unreliable.
By Masato Fujitake
The paper studies how different optimizers perform as training duration (overtraining) increases, focusing on matrix‑preconditioned methods (Muon, SOAP) and a momentum‑scheduled method (ADANA) compared to AdamW. Across models ranging from 51M to 253M parameters and overtraining factors up to 256×, the authors find that optimal learning‑rate schedules, weight‑decay coefficients, and memory settings shift with horizon, and that ADANA consistently outperforms AdamW, especially with log‑time weight decay and momentum cooldown. Muon and SOAP maintain roughly constant token‑efficiency advantages, with SOAP potentially improving at the highest overtraining levels.
By Katie Everett, Shikai Qiu
arXiv:2610. 03306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing convergence analyses of Muon either assume exact orthogonalization or analyze classical Newton--Schulz polynomials, and guarantee only stationarity, so it is unresolved what Muon's five tuned Newton--Schulz steps preserve and whether that suffices to reach a prescribed neural-network training loss.
By Amartya Roy, Souvik Chakraborty
arXiv:2607. 22444v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For scale-invariant deep networks, Hyperball-style optimizers have shown strong performance in large-scale training by fixing the norms of matrix-valued parameters and normalizing updates.
By Yihao Xiao, Jialong Sun, Zitian Gao, Zeming Wei, Chutian Wang, Ran Tao, Jiaye Teng, Bryan Dai
arXiv:2608. 01997v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Single-optimizer training is a poor fit for the distinct phases of deep network optimization: adaptive methods handle noisy early gradients well but overshoot flat minima, while SGD with momentum generalizes better in the late phase but converges slowly early on.
By Alok Kumar Pandey, Umang Chaturvedi, Aatish Rana, Gopi Krishna Nedanuri
arXiv:2606. 22932v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reverse-mode differentiation computes every weight gradient, writes it to memory, and only then lets the optimizer read it back.
By Dikshant Kukreja, Kritarth Prasad, Avinash Anand, Zhengkui Wang, Erik Cambria, Timothy Liu, Aik Beng Ng, Simon See, Bapi Chatterjee