Improving video captioning quality typically demands retraining large vision-language models, an expensive and often impractical requirement. Existing training-free alternatives instead ground captions in detected objects to curb hallucination, but apply only a single, fixed correction pass without prioritizing which objects matter most, leaving semantically significant content omitted.
arXiv:2609.00709v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models produce fluent image descriptions but offer limited semantic control: users cannot reliably specify whether captions sho...
By Jongyeop Hyun, Taeyoung Kim, Hyounghun Kim
arXiv:2608.21819v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reliable image captioning in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) requires captions to be both precise and complete, avoiding unsupported object mentions wh...
By Jihyung Ko, Eunji Jung, Hyeongsub Kim, Ziseok Lee, Jae Won Cho, Sanghyun Jo, Kyungsu Kim
arXiv:2604. 02327v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pretrained Vision Transformers (ViTs) such as DINOv2 and MAE provide generic image features that can be applied to a variety of downstream tasks such as retrieval, classification, and segmentation.
By Jona Ruthardt, Manu Gaur, Deva Ramanan, Makarand Tapaswi, Yuki M. Asano
arXiv:2607. 08489v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models excel at video captioning, yet typically generate descriptions that fail to capture individual viewers' attention.
By Shenghui Chen, Po-han Li, Ximeng Sun, Shijia Yang, Emad Barsoum, Zicheng Liu, Sandeep Chinchali, Ufuk Topcu
arXiv:2609.00591v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: An image may be worth a thousand words, but most captioning models describe it in only a few. Modern vision-language models produce fluent high-level c...
By Suryaansh Jain, Rahasya Barkur, Vishal G, Ryan Rossi, Franck Dernoncourt, Jack Wang, Koustava Goswami, Nedim Lipka, Puneet Mathur, Samyadeep Basu, Seunghyun Yoon
arXiv:2606. 23763v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work typically assesses vision--language consistency using attention distributions of answer-side tokens.
By Yiyang Chen, Yixin Tan, Binrui Shen
arXiv:2512. 20014v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models generalize well to generic instructions, they struggle with personalized commands such as "bring my cup," where the robot must act on one specific instance among visually similar objects.
By Sangoh Lee, Sangwoo Mo, Wook-Shin Han
arXiv:2607. 24017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The empirical success of attention mechanism in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often obscures its inherent, subtle flaws.
By Pengkun Jiao, Bin Zhu, Jingjing Chen, Yu-gang Jiang
arXiv:2605. 20950v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) face a bottleneck of prohibitive computational costs arising from massive visual token sequences during inference.
By Yulin Zhao, Zheng Zhang
Vision-language models excel at video captioning, yet typically generate descriptions that fail to capture individual viewers' attention. We propose VEGAS (Video caption Evaluation via GAze Score), a training-free metric that leverages test-time gaze to sample personalized, attention-aligned text.
arXiv:2510. 14904v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Dense Video Object Captioning (DVOC) is the task of jointly detecting, tracking, and captioning object trajectories in a video, requiring the ability to understand spatio-temporal details and describe them in natural language.
By Gabriel Fiastre, Antoine Yang, Cordelia Schmid