PACT: Privileged Trace Co-Training for Multi-Turn Tool-Use Agents
arXiv:2606. 16215v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-turn tool-use agents must reason, call tools, and adapt to observations across several interaction turns.
arXiv:2606. 16215v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-turn tool-use agents must reason, call tools, and adapt to observations across several interaction turns.
arXiv:2601. 03555v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training reliable tool-augmented agents remains a significant challenge, largely due to the difficulty of credit assignment in multi-step reasoning.
arXiv:2510. 05592v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Outcome-driven reinforcement learning has advanced reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but prevailing tool-augmented approaches train a single, monolithic policy that interleaves thoughts and tool calls under full context; this scales poorly with long horizons and diverse tools and generalizes weakly to new scenarios.
arXiv:2606. 02132v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning can induce tool abuse, where models overuse external tools even for queries solvable by internal reasoning.
arXiv:2606. 03762v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) equips large language models (LLMs) with tool-use capabilities that substantially improve reasoning on complex tasks.
The paper introduces MSARL, a Multi‑Small‑Agent Reinforcement Learning framework that separates reasoning from tool use. A single Reasoning Agent plans and decomposes tasks, while multiple specialized Tool Agents handle specific external tools, each trained with imitation learning and reinforcement learning using role‑specific rewards. Experiments on mathematical problem solving with code execution show that MSARL improves reasoning stability and final‑answer accuracy compared to single‑agent baselines, and the architecture generalizes to other tool‑use tasks.
ARISE‑RL is a full‑cycle self‑evolution framework that couples a task/rubric generator with a reasoning solver, enabling open‑ended agents to learn via reinforcement learning without relying on gold answers. The generator creates tool‑grounded rubric criteria and rewards itself for producing valid, intermediate‑difficulty tasks, while the solver improves through fine‑grained rubric satisfaction signals and multi‑step reasoning. The framework also introduces Reward‑Gated Self‑Evolution Distillation to selectively distill memory‑augmented policies, reducing distribution mismatch, and it is evaluated on the new ECR‑Bench rubric suite, achieving state‑of‑the‑art performance across all benchmarks.
PlanPO introduces a group planning-aware policy optimization method for multi-turn agentic large language models, addressing the issue of advantage collapse caused by treating all successful trajectories equally. By incorporating coarse-to-fine advantage signals that reflect differences in trajectory and turn lengths, PlanPO encourages agents to learn generalizable planning and generation behaviors. Experiments show a 27.2% average improvement over GRPO on benchmarks such as ALFWorld, WebShop, and SciWorld, with minimal extra training cost.
arXiv:2608. 04007v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) enables LLMs to solve complex tasks through iterative tool interactions.
arXiv:2606. 01281v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
The paper introduces Rollout-Time Intervention (RTI), a method that uses reward-side evidence during rollouts to transform unsuccessful trajectories into successful ones, thereby providing learning signals for tasks beyond a policy’s intrinsic exploration limits. RTI filters out trajectories with excessive distributional shifts, allowing these off-policy interventions to guide policy optimization effectively. Experiments on five benchmarks show that RTI consistently outperforms existing RL baselines, enabling post-trained policies to approach the performance of stronger large language models and surpass their original capability boundaries.
arXiv:2607. 15660v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While LLM agents demonstrate strong reasoning abilities in compact and well-defined scenarios, they struggle to maintain robustness and effectiveness when faced with large-scale, diverse, and dynamic real-world environments that demand seamless tool integration.