Two Stages of Folding: Convergent Mechanisms in AI Protein Folding Trunks
arXiv:2602. 06020v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How do protein structure prediction models fold proteins?
The paper investigates how ESMFold’s folding trunk transforms amino‑acid sequences into 3D protein structures by using sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to uncover interpretable features. It first analyzes representation distributions across modules and recycles to identify distinct spatial computations, then shows that single representations carry inherited semantics while pair representations compute pairwise geometry. Finally, the authors use a reasoning language model and gradient‑based attribution to trace concept composition across blocks, verifying alignment with known biochemistry and demonstrating that the trained sparse dictionaries can predict the model’s fold quality, thereby turning the black‑box trunk into an interpretable, scientifically verifiable circuit.
arXiv:2602. 06020v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How do protein structure prediction models fold proteins?
arXiv:2608.29207v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Protein structure modeling rests on a single computational primitive: the interaction between what a residue is (sequence content) and where it sits (t...
The paper introduces a scalable method to interpret sparse autoencoder (SAE) features in the ESM-2 protein language model by leveraging geometrically inspired features of the protein α‑carbon backbone. Across 8M layers of ESM-2, a false discovery rate–controlled analysis shows that local geometry is significantly associated with many SAE features, revealing substructure within known biological labels and enabling annotation of unannotated metagenomic proteins. Ablation experiments demonstrate that removing these geometric features shifts ESM-2’s predicted contact maps toward the descriptor, linking mechanistic interpretability with structural biology.
SymFold introduces a symmetric dual‑path architecture that combines protein language models (PLMs) and multimodal protein language models (MPLMs) to iteratively guide protein sequence generation for inverse folding. By leveraging pretrained sequence evolution knowledge from PLMs and structural knowledge from MPLMs, the method improves upon the traditional serial pipeline where structure encoders produce coarse sequences refined by PLMs. Experiments on standard inverse‑folding benchmarks show state‑of‑the‑art performance, and ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of the symmetric design.
arXiv:2608. 16094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate protein structure prediction is fundamental to structural biology because protein structure underlies molecular function and provides a basis for mechanistic interpretation.
arXiv:2605. 01625v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Proteins are inherently multiscale physical systems whose functional properties emerge from coordinated structural organization across multiple spatial resolutions, ranging from atomic interactions to global fold topology.
arXiv:2606. 27440v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models for structural biology have achieved remarkable performance in predicting biomolecular structure and show promise for the design of proteins and small molecules.
arXiv:2609.38879v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models rely heavily on human text, which often conveys surface answers rather than the spatial and structural logic behind them. Prote...
arXiv:2603. 19636v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Accurate RNA structure modeling remains difficult because RNA backbones are highly flexible, non-canonical interactions are prevalent, and experimentally determined 3D structures are comparatively scarce.
arXiv:2605. 02937v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning in de novo protein design has achieved atomic-level fidelity.
arXiv:2607. 16087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AlphaFold2's 93 million parameters, shaped by the evolutionary record of protein structure encoded in the Protein Data Bank and in sequence alignments, are conventionally treated only as machinery for converting sequence to structure.
arXiv:2506. 07459v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Protein generative models have shown remarkable promise in protein design, yet their success rates remain constrained by reliance on curated sequence-structure datasets and by misalignment between supervised objectives and real design goals.