arXiv AI

Neural Evidence and Behavioural Welfare Economics: When Can Neuroeconomics Inform Policy?

arXiv AI
Oct 19

Functional Welfare for AI Safety

The paper argues that AI welfare should be considered a safety issue, not just an ethical one, by introducing the concept of 'functional welfare'—states in models that influence behavior. It claims that functional welfare naturally emerges as models develop coherent goals and personas, should be monitored and targeted in post‑training, and can be empirically measured. The authors propose three tests for functional welfare attribution and apply them to Gemma 3 27B, finding that rejecting model answers increases frustration and rule‑breaking, while fine‑tuning on narrated solutions reduces frustration.

By Rikhil Jhaveri, Jamie Johnson, Punya Syon Pandey, David Demitri Africa
arXiv AI
Oct 23

Adaptive Entangled Neurons in the Brain and Natural Intelligence Simulations for Artificial General Intelligence

The paper proposes that quantum entanglement underlies the synchronization of millions of neurons, introducing the Liu‑Chen‑Ao (LCA) hypothesis of entangled nerve fibers. Using a nonlocal many‑body wave equation, the authors model collective behaviors among adaptive agents and apply this framework to Chinese intraday stock market data, finding that adaptive entangled game modes explain 82‑94% of decision patterns and that only a small fraction of actions are truly independent. These empirical results support the LCA hypothesis and suggest that incorporating probability‑wave‑based entangled modules could improve artificial general intelligence by creating more efficient, human‑like processing units. whyItMatters":"The study provides empirical evidence for the LCA hypothesis and highlights the limitations of conventional artificial neural networks, pointing toward more efficient and robust AGI architectures."

By Haochen Li, Xinshuai Guo, Jingdong Ouyang, Wei Zhang, Leilei Shi
arXiv AI
Oct 27

A Battery for AI Propensity Measurement: Rubrics, Synthetic Item Banks, and Annotations

The paper introduces a battery of 28 AI propensities, each accompanied by expert-written rubrics, synthetic datasets, and annotated demand intervals. These propensities are drawn from psychometric, psychological, and behavioral research to help interpret AI system behavior in familiar human‑behavior constructs. The synthetic datasets are designed to be sensitive to a single propensity, enabling quick prototyping of propensity profiles, while the rubrics aid in annotating existing benchmarks for relevance to specific propensities.

By Peter Romero, Haotian Li, Hugo Save, Luning Sun, Zachary R. Tidler, Kazuya Horibe, Joe Watson, Daniel Romero-Alvarado, Israel Mason-Williams, Fernando Mart\'inez-Plumed, Jos\'e Hern\'andez-Orallo
arXiv AI
2d ago

Decision Models as Scalable Economic Surrogates that Capture Human Variation

Decision Models (DMs) are a new class of AI models that provide fast responses and output a probability distribution over a fixed set of options. In a first evaluation, 10 DMs were compared with 8 Large Language Models (LLMs) across three economic settings—a household spending survey, classic economic games, and a labour‑market field experiment. Frontier DMs, those scoring highest on general decision‑making benchmarks, reproduced human response variation more closely than LLMs in all settings, matched LLMs on modal responses in the spending survey, and were roughly ten times faster and over a hundred times cheaper than the fastest LLM.

By Maxime Saxena, Fabio Caccioli, R. Maria del Rio-Chanona