arXiv Computation and Language

Type Diversity Enables Transformers to Generalise Compositionally

The paper investigates why Transformers struggle more with structural than lexical compositional generalisation. It argues that this disparity stems from low structural type diversity rather than an inherent limitation of Transformers. By creating linguistically diverse variants of the COGS and SLOG datasets, the authors show that type diversity correlates equally with generalisation in both lexical and structural cases, challenging previous explanations of the difficulty.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Generalization through Lexical Abstraction in Transformer Models: The Case of Functional Words

The study investigates whether pretrained transformer models encode functional words—such as pronouns and adverbs—in a way that mirrors human usage. By comparing embeddings of nouns with those of their functional counterparts in both isolated and parallel sentences, the authors find that functional words occupy a central yet distinct position in embedding space and that parallel lexicalized and functional sentences reside in different subspaces. Experiments show that only a mixed training set of functional and lexicalized sentences reveals shared syntactic and semantic structure, whereas training on either type alone fails to capture this parallelism.

By Giuseppe Samo, Vivi Nastase, Paola Merlo
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Compositional Generalization via Structural Identification in a Category-Theoretic Framework

The paper proposes a new way to evaluate compositional generalization by examining which structural or lexical identifications allow held‑out COGS examples to be considered admissible based on training data. Sentences are modeled as functors from syntactic addresses to lexical tokens, and selective collapses induce Kan extensions that propagate observed associations. Across 21 COGS generalization types, admissibility follows distinct identification profiles, while residual failures highlight unsupported structural templates, providing data‑side diagnoses of what the training corpus licenses without training a predictive model.

By Akihiro Maeda, Thomas Seiller, Yohei Oseki
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 26

A survey of diversity quantification in natural language processing: The why, what, where and how

The paper surveys over 300 recent NLP studies to address fragmentation in diversity measurement. It proposes an NLP‑specific framework with four perspectives—why, what, where, and how—drawing on unified cross‑domain frameworks from ecology and economics. The authors find that variety and disparity measures dominate, balance measures are scarce, and many current metrics do not fit Stirling’s framework, leading to recommendations for unified terminology and normative debate.

By Louis Est\`eve, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Nurit Melnik, Agata Savary, Olha Kanishcheva
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Controlling the Diversity-Quality Trade-Off of LLMs by Merging Models Before and After Alignment

The paper proposes a depth‑aware FrankenMerging technique that blends lower layers of an aligned large language model (LLM) with higher layers of its base counterpart to balance diversity and quality without extra training. Experiments demonstrate that adjusting the layer split controls both lexical and semantic diversity, often surpassing the aligned model in semantic diversity and outperforming temperature sampling in most settings. The method is validated by an ablation that reverses the merge order, supporting the hypothesis about layer‑specific diversity contributions.

By Yasuaki Sumita, Tomoharu Iwata, Toshiyuki Tanaka
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Inferred Generative-Process Diversity Predicts Correlated Failure Across Language Models

The paper introduces a new measure of generative‑process diversity for language models, using Normalised Compression Distance on raw outputs after controlling for permutation effects. Across 38 models, this metric uncovers population structure that semantic similarity misses and predicts lower correlated failures across ten benchmark families, independent of semantic similarity or model capability. The authors argue that higher generative‑process diversity reduces correlated failures in multi‑model systems, offering a practical tool for safety‑relevant applications.

By Ross Tieman, Evan Markou
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

From Parallels to Divergence: Language Models' Learning of Action Nominal Constructions

The paper examines how language models learn action nominal constructions (ANCs) across 96 synthetic target languages with varied grammatical features. Using GPT‑2‑small trained from scratch, the study evaluates models on minimal pairs covering 34 grammatical phenomena, revealing that models mirror typological patterns in basic clause configurations but diverge in complement systems and ANC strategies. The findings suggest that natural language distributions may arise from both general learning pressures and functional demands not fully captured by current model experiments.

By Iskar Deng, Shane Steinert-Threlkeld