arXiv:2606. 07308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study off-policy evaluation (OPE) under strategic behavior where decision subjects (or agents) respond to a decision maker's policy by strategically modifying their covariates.
By Kiet Q. H. Vo, Abbavaram Gowtham Reddy, Julian Rodemann, Siu Lun Chau, Krikamol Muandet
The paper examines AI disclosure policies in top computer science venues, finding them to be highly under‑specified. A survey of 109 researchers shows that disclosures are deemed most necessary for research design tasks and when human involvement is low, and it compiles researchers’ expectations for disclosure content. Analysis of 13,867 disclosure statements from EMNLP 2025 and ICLR 2026 reveals a significant mismatch between these expectations and actual practice, such as frequent disclosure of writing assistance despite it being considered less necessary.
By Arati Mohapatra, Danish Pruthi
As generative AI tools find increasing use in research workflows, ongoing debates on their impact, appropriateness and responsible use have led policymakers to enact policies to disclose AI use at mul...
arXiv:2606. 10137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A common assumption in strategic classification is that the classifier is public knowledge.
By Ivri Hikri, Nir Rosenfeld
arXiv:2606. 29657v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems become more capable, training procedures that optimize for downstream outcomes risk introducing implicit agency: goal-directed behavior that designers never specified.
By Yoshua Bengio, Oliver Richardson, Tom\'a\v{s} Gaven\v{c}iak, Michael Cohen, Rory Svarc, Damiano Fornasiere, Gael Gendron, David Hyland, Aton Kamanda, Adam Oberman, Francis Rhys Ward, Anna Gaven\v{c}iak, Jacob Livingston Slosser, Vincent Mai, Iulian Serban, Joumana Ghosn
As AI systems become more capable, training procedures that optimize for downstream outcomes risk introducing implicit agency: goal-directed behavior that designers never specified. We present a formal safety argument for the Scientist AI (SAI) Predictor, trained to approximate the Bayesian posterior conditioned on a dataset of "epistemically contextualized" natural-language statements.
arXiv:2607. 14345v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: People use language models for practical questions whose answers are difficult to verify.
By Jan Betley, Johannes Treutlein, Jan Dubi\'nski, Harry Mayne, Karol Ga{\l}\k{a}zka, Niels Warncke, Anna Sztyber-Betley, Owain Evans
arXiv:2606. 27379v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models increasingly face demands to "forget" training data, knowledge, or behaviors due to regulatory deletion obligations, copyright/licensing disputes, and safety or product-policy requirements.
By Sangyeon Yoon, Yeachan Jun, Albert No
arXiv:2606. 12587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traditionally, decision support studies how humans use machine learning models to make better decisions.
By Shayan Kiyani, Sima Noorani, George Pappas, Hamed Hassani
The growing role of AI-generated content and AI-enabled systems in public communication has led regulators to demand clear disclosure of content provenance and AI involvement. But the effects of such disclosures remain uncertain.
arXiv:2609.17223v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Medical AI models hold immense potential to improve patient outcomes, but they are also known to unintentionally memorise individual records from their...
By Moritz A. Knolle, Martin J. Menten, Laurin Lux, M\'elanie Roschewitz, Emma A. M. Stanley, Georgios Kaissis, Daniel Rueckert, Ben Glocker
arXiv:2608. 11794v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The growing role of AI-generated content and AI-enabled systems in public communication has led regulators to demand clear disclosure of content provenance and AI involvement.
By Adrian Rauchfleisch, Andreas Jungherr