arXiv:2609.27076v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Open-vocabulary visual grounding enables robots to localise task-relevant entities from natural-language queries without dependence on predefined perce...
By Linus Nwankwo, Muslim Alaran, Christian Rauch, Stanley Chukwuebuka Obilikpa, Elmar Rueckert
arXiv:2610.20352v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models have made significant progress in referring expression comprehension (REC), yet most REC benchmarks still focus on fin...
By Tianyi Gao, Han Fang, Xin Wei, Yaoyao Zhong, Zhaoyan Pan, Weijie Zhu, Hongbo Sun, Zhiyu Lin, Kaicheng Yang, Jinglin Xu, Ye Yuan, Hao Li, Hao Sun, Jingmin Xin
arXiv:2512. 06276v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Referring Expression Comprehension (REC) is a vision-language task that localizes a specific image region based on a textual description.
By Tianyi Gao, Hao Li, Han Fang, Xin Wei, Xiaodong Dong, Hongbo Sun, Ye Yuan, Zhongjiang He, Jinglin Xu, Jingmin Xin, Hao Sun
arXiv:2512. 23020v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: 3D visual grounding aims to locate objects based on natural language descriptions in 3D scenes.
By Wenyuan Huang, Zhenyu Zhang, Zhao Wang, Zhou Wei, Ting Huang, Fang Zhao, Jian Yang
arXiv:2505.22850v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Referring Expression Counting (REC) requires distinguishing visually similar objects described by fine-grained text cues. Existing methods tackle t...
By Kostas Triaridis, Panagiotis Kaliosis, E-Ro Nguyen, Jingyi Xu, Dimitris Samaras, Hieu Le
LangMap introduces a human‑verified benchmark for language‑conditioned goal navigation (LGN) that spans four hierarchical semantic levels—scene, room, region, and instance—within real‑world indoor 3D scans. The dataset, built on HM3D, contains 18K tasks with concise and detailed descriptions for 414 object categories, and its contrastive annotation protocol ensures high‑quality, discriminative region and instance labels. Evaluation shows that LangMap’s descriptions improve text‑to‑view matching accuracy by 23 points over GOAT‑Bench and achieve a 92.5% unique‑and‑correct match rate in an independent human audit, while a proposed RGB‑only baseline, PlaNaVid, attains top‑tier success rates without depth or 3D scene representations.
By Bo Miao, Weijia Liu, Jun Luo, Lachlan Shinnick, Jian Liu, Thomas Hamilton-Smith, Yuhe Yang, Zijie Wu, Vanja Videnovic, Feras Dayoub, Anton van den Hengel
arXiv:2610.09502v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Open-vocabulary detection (OVD) recognizes categories unseen during training through textual category queries, yet achieving strong generalization with...
By Yupeng Zhang, Ziyi Zhao, Juntao Cheng, Sheng Wang, Ningnan Guo, Ruize Han, Liang Wan
Open-vocabulary detection (OVD) recognizes categories unseen during training through textual category queries, yet achieving strong generalization with real-time efficiency remains challenging. Beyond...
arXiv:2608.14835v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Dynamic scene graphs (DSGs) capture spatio-temporal interactions across videos as $\langle$subject, predicate, object$\rangle$ triplets, and underp...
By John Helsby, Yi Yang, Bodo Rosenhahn, Michael Ying Yang
arXiv:2609.22588v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) perform strongly on visual question answering benchmarks, yet often make decisions that contradict visual evidence they h...
By Yuyang Dai, Bofei Huang, Hongbo Zhang, Haoran Xie
arXiv:2603.28301v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong performance in robotic manipulation by leveraging pre-trained vision-language backbones. However...
By Chanyoung Kim, Minwoo Kim, Minseok Kang, Hyunwoo Kim, Dahuin Jung
Knowledge-Intensive Visual Question Answering (KI-VQA) benchmarks evaluate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as multimodal knowledge assistants by requiring external information beyond a provided image to answer questions. KI-VQA involves multiple sub-problems -referring expression understanding, visual grounding, object recognition, knowledge retrieval, and reasoning-yet existing benchmarks typically report only end-task accuracy, obscuring where failures arise.