arXiv Computer Vision

Rethinking Gradient Modulation in Multimodal Regression

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Confidence Falls Short: Asymmetric Certainty Gains from Optimization Hinder Multimodal Classification

The paper identifies that in multimodal learning, optimization often produces asymmetric certainty gains, with the stronger modality becoming more confident than the weaker one, which leads to imbalanced contributions and suboptimal performance. The authors attribute this issue to unimodal characteristics and propose a Max Confidence Regularization (MaxCR) method that tracks each modality’s semantic confidence via a nonlinear sparsity measure and applies max suppression and excitation to balance confidence levels. Experiments on standard datasets demonstrate that MaxCR improves overall performance compared to state‑of‑the‑art multimodal baselines.

By Longfei Huang, Xiangyu Wu, Yang Yang
arXiv Machine Learning
6d ago

Fusion or Confusion? Multimodal Complexity Is Not All You Need

The paper reexamines the belief that more complex multimodal neural architectures lead to better performance. By reimplementing 19 influential multimodal methods across nine datasets with up to 23 modalities, the authors find that increased architectural complexity often causes confusion rather than effective fusion, and such models rarely surpass unimodal baselines or a simple baseline (SimBaMM). They also highlight methodological flaws in top-tier multimodal studies and call for a shift toward standardized evaluation and methodological rigor.

By Tillmann Rheude, Roland Eils, Benjamin Wild
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Generalized Multimodal Foundation Model

The paper introduces a generalized multimodal foundation model that can handle arbitrary combinations of modalities and prediction tasks. It trains on large-scale synthetic multimodal datasets with diverse causal structures to learn transferable multimodal correlations. Experiments on 18 real-world datasets across 12 modalities and 11 tasks show competitive performance compared to specialized models without task-specific adaptation.

By Huizi Cui, Zongbo Han, Chenggong Ding, Naichuan Xiao, Jialong Yang, Jingdong Chen, Guangyu Wang, Qinghua Hu, Changqing Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

VCMM: Variance-Calibrated Momentum for Multimodal Learning

VCMM: Variance-Calibrated Momentum for Multimodal Learning proposes a new optimizer that adapts momentum based on modality-specific gradient dynamics. It estimates minibatch noise and temporal drift online, using a Kalman-inspired controller to set modality-specific momentum and applies bias correction for the first moment. Experiments on four multimodal benchmarks show consistent improvements with modest training overhead.

By Zhongjing Gu, Chenyang Huang, Yufa Feng, Chong He, Qinxu Ding, Yiming Cui
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Mitigating Strong-Modality Collapse in Multimodal Learning via Inverted Asymmetric Fusion

The paper introduces Inverted Asymmetric Fusion (IAF) to address strong-modality collapse in multimodal learning, where dominant modalities are degraded during fusion. IAF preserves the dominant modality by passing it unchanged and letting weaker modalities attend to it, while also strengthening weaker modalities via Modality-Aware Knowledge Distillation. Experiments on MultiHuSE, UR-FUNNY, and MUStARD show that IAF maintains unimodal performance and improves over the best unimodal baseline by up to 8.25%.

By Mary Ogbuka Kenneth, Foaad Khosmood, Abbas Edalat
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 5

Balancing Multimodal Learning via Functional Progress

The paper introduces Function‑Space Guided Multimodal Optimization (FGMO) to address modality imbalance in multimodal learning. FGMO uses Functional Progress Estimation (FPE) to measure each modality’s function‑space response and Functional Response Control (FRC) to redistribute learning‑rate budgets, aiming to balance optimization progress across modalities. The authors provide theoretical analysis of FRC’s target‑contraction property and demonstrate FGMO’s effectiveness on several multimodal benchmarks.

By Zhongjing Gu, Fengqiang Wan, Yiming Cui, Yufa Feng, Yang Yang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 1

Fusion Anything: A Generalized Multimodal Foundation Model

The paper introduces Fusion Anything Model (FAM), a foundation model designed for generalized multimodal data fusion that can handle arbitrary modality combinations and prediction tasks. FAM is trained on large-scale synthetic multimodal datasets generated via Structural Multimodal Causal Models (SMCMs), enabling it to encode transferable multimodal correlations. Experiments on 18 real-world datasets across 12 modalities and 11 tasks show that FAM performs competitively with specialized models without requiring task-specific adaptation.

By Huizi Cui, Zongbo Han, Chenggong Ding, Naichuan Xiao, Jialong Yang, Jingdong Chen, Guangyu Wang, Qinghua Hu, Changqing Zhang