arXiv:2608. 04444v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often generate inaccurate answers due to their reliance on static internal knowledge.
By Jiaoyang Li, Junhao Ruan, Shengwei Tang, Kaiyan Chang, Zhengtao Yu, Tong Xiao, Jingbo Zhu
arXiv:2608. 07838v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have increasingly supported response generation grounded in user-provided knowledge spanning heterogeneous structures.
By Shibo Chu, Yuze Liu, Tiehua Zhang, Zhishu Shen, Lianghua He, Haofen Wang, Zhijun Ding
arXiv:2607. 10562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the multi-hop reasoning capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge.
By JungMin Yun, JuneHyoung Kwon, YoungBin Kim
arXiv:2604. 01993v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-hop QA benchmarks often reward Large Language Models (LLMs) for spurious correctness, where models reach correct answers through invalid intermediate reasoning.
By Daeyong Kwon, Soyoung Yoon, Seung-won Hwang
arXiv:2607. 23019v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enables large language models (LLMs) to tackle multi-step reasoning tasks, yet the generated intermediate steps are not guaranteed to be logically sound.
By Zirong Chen, Meiyi Ma
arXiv:2607. 00341v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models achieve strong performance on many reasoning tasks when allowed to externalize intermediate steps as Chain-of-Thought (CoT).
By Hengyu Fu, Tianyu Guo, Zixuan Wang, Hanlin Zhu, Jason D. Lee, Jiantao Jiao, Stuart Russell, Song Mei
arXiv:2606. 05402v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large reasoning models (LRMs) produce reasoning traces with non-linear structures, such as backtracking and self-correction, that complicate the evaluation and monitoring of the reasoning process.
By Jinu Lee, Shivam Agarwal, Amruta Parulekar, Siddarth Madala, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Julia Hockenmaier
arXiv:2607. 22597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-hop question answering requires systems to retrieve evidence from multiple documents and connect scattered facts into a coherent reasoning process.
By Hong-Yu An, Yun-Jian Zhang, Chen-Wei Liang, Tian-Yi Zhang, Jian Ding, Yi-Lun Wu, Ao-Bo Li, Wei-Cong Su, Saifullah, Mujiangshan Wang
arXiv:2606. 17856v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (GraphRAG) is effective for knowledge-intensive and multi-hop query tasks; however, many existing methods primarily seed entity-based graphs and rely on implicit semantic relevance propagation.
By Bihao Zhan, Zongsheng Cao, Jie Zhou, Bo Zhang, Liang He
arXiv:2606. 03705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are widely used to mitigate the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as outdated knowledge and hallucinations.
By Weiwei Ding, Zixuan Li, Long Bai, Zhuo Chen, Kun Su, Fei Wang, Xiaolong Jin, Jin Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng
arXiv:2608. 05124v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long context reasoning in large language models (LLMs) is usually constrained by the fact that a single inference trajectory has to simultaneously explore the context, store intermediate state, verify evidence, and produce the final answer.
By Purbesh Mitra, Sennur Ulukus
arXiv:2502. 11491v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing.
By Runxuan Liu, Bei Luo, Jiaqi Li, Baoxin Wang, Ming Liu, Dayong Wu, Shijin Wang, Bing Qin