arXiv AI

Unified Multimodal Model for Brain MRI Imputation and Understanding

arXiv:2606. 16484v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) hold great potential for medicine, as they inherit knowledge from LLM and allow multiple data modalities to be integrated, analysed and interpreted in natural language.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

MMAP: Multimodal Missing-Aware Pretraining for Longitudinal Alzheimer's Prediction

MMAP is a Multimodal Missing‑Aware Alignment Pretraining method designed to learn image‑tabular representations from incomplete data. It uses a sigmoid contrastive learning image encoder with generative reconstruction, a tabular encoder based on a foundation model, and a missing token generator to handle missing modalities. The approach is evaluated on longitudinal Alzheimer’s tasks—predicting disease stage conversion and amyloid status—and outperforms both multimodal and unimodal baselines.

By Fiona Kekwick, Matthew Baugh, Bernhard Kainz, Paul M. Matthews, Wenjia Bai
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 16

Unsupervised Learning for Missing Modalities in Multimodal Learning

arXiv:2606. 15743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper addresses the missing-modality challenge in multi-modal learning by introducing Unsupervised Learning for Missing Modalities in Multi-Modal Learning (UL4M4), a flexible framework that imputes missing feature embeddings in a task-independent manner before supervised prediction.

By Hassan Ismkhan, Hamid Bouchahcia
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 17

Multimodal Semantic-Aware Contrastive Learning For False Negative Mitigation in 3D Medical Imaging

arXiv:2607. 14995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal Contrastive Learning (CL) has shown significant performance in aligning representations across various data modalities and improving downstream tasks, especially in healthcare.

By Sara Ketabi, Matthias W. Wagner, Cynthia Hawkins, Uri Tabori, Birgit Betina Ertl-Wagner, Farzad Khalvati
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 14

Learning Sparse Latent Predictive Foundation Model for Multimodal Neuroimaging

The paper introduces Neuro‑JEPA, a sparse multimodal foundation model that learns unified representations of brain MRI across T1w, T2w, and FLAIR sequences using a latent predictive objective and a Mixture‑of‑Experts architecture. It was pretrained on over 1.5 million scans from 428,647 studies and systematically evaluates architectural, masking, objective, and sparsity choices for robust multimodal representation learning. Across 47 tasks from three health systems and 12 public datasets, Neuro‑JEPA consistently outperforms a simple CNN baseline, demonstrating its effectiveness for both clinical and research applications.

By Haoxu Huang, Long Chen, Jingyun Chen, Jinu Hyun, James Ryan Loftus, Kara Melmed, Daniel Orringer, Jennifer Frontera, Seena Dehkharghani, Arjun Masurkar, Narges Razavian
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 10

When to Align, When to Predict: A Phase Diagram for Multimodal Learning

arXiv:2606. 11190v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-modal alignment (CA) and cross-modal prediction (CP) are the dominant paradigms for multimodal representation learning, yet there is no systematic understanding of when each succeeds, when each fails, and when cross-modal training helps at all -- a gap that leaves practitioners, especially in scientific domains like biomedicine or astrophysics, with heterogeneous instruments and multiple levels of organization and measurement, unable to diagnose why standard methods underperform the best single modality.

By Ilay Kamai, Hugues Van Assel, Aviv Regev, Hagai B. Perets, Randall Balestriero
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 9

When to Align, When to Predict: A Phase Diagram for Multimodal Learning

Cross-modal alignment (CA) and cross-modal prediction (CP) are the dominant paradigms for multimodal representation learning, yet there is no systematic understanding of when each succeeds, when each fails, and when cross-modal training helps at all -- a gap that leaves practitioners, especially in scientific domains like biomedicine or astrophysics, with heterogeneous instruments and multiple levels of organization and measurement, unable to diagnose why standard methods underperform the best single modality. We develop a unified linear framework that addresses both questions.