arXiv Machine Learning

Gen-PINNs: Generative Adversarial Physics Informed Neural Networks for solving partial differential equations

Gen-PINNs introduces a deterministic residual-adversarial framework that combines Generative Adversarial Networks with Physics-Informed Neural Networks to solve partial differential equations. The method addresses limitations of standard PINNs—such as spectral bias, loss imbalance, and optimizer stagnation—by using a generator that learns the PDE solution with dynamically weighted physics-informed losses and discriminators that assess residuals against zero-residual states. Experiments on nonlinear and higher-order PDEs (Burgers, Allen‑Cahn, Kuramoto‑Sivashinsky) show significant gains in accuracy and convergence, especially for sharp-front, stiff, and high-order problems.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

On the training of physics-informed neural operators for solving parametric partial differential equations

arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.

By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

StablePDENet: Enhancing Neural Operator Stability through Physics-Informed Residual-Sensitivity Regularization

The paper introduces StablePDENet, a physics-informed adversarial training framework that regularizes the residual sensitivity of neural operators to improve stability against input perturbations. The method formulates operator learning as a min–max optimization, where a physics-based projected‑gradient adversary generates perturbations and the outer objective combines the attacked physics loss with a normalized residual‑sensitivity penalty. Experiments on benchmark problems show that StablePDENet outperforms PI‑DeepONet and its adversarial variant in accuracy under adversarial attacks while maintaining competitive performance on clean data, and it also enhances generalization and highlights the distinction between model sensitivity and intrinsic operator ill‑conditioning.

By Chutian Huang, Chang Ma, Kaibo Wang, Yang Xiang