arXiv:2608. 02937v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Designing an effective electromagnetic inverse-scattering solver requires faithful enforcement of nonlinear full-wave physics together with an expressive prior on the unknown permittivity contrast.
By Wenhan Guo, Yuan Gao, Yu Sun
arXiv:2608. 17344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural network surrogates are an emerging alternative to traditional electromagnetic wave simulators like finite-difference time-domain (FDTD); their goal is to replace rigorous physical simulations with pre-trained neural networks that solve wave-scattering forward and inverse problems orders of magnitude faster.
By Charles Dove, Laura Waller
arXiv:2608. 05839v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep neural networks have shown great empirical success in the solution of a wide variety of ill-posed inverse problems in imaging.
By Alexander Auras, Martin Burger, Samira Kabri, Michael Moeller, Michael Schopf-Kuester
arXiv:2606. 28158v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising framework for addressing the Calder\'on inverse problem from limited boundary data.
By Ali AlHadi Kalout, Pablo Tejerina-P\'erez, Konstantin Karchev, Pedro Taranc\'on-\'Alvarez, Leonid Sarieddine, Raul Jimenez, Max Engelstein, Guy David
arXiv:2607. 22867v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Optical scattering has conventionally been regarded as an impediment in imaging research due to the degradation of image quality during reconstruction.
By Eunji Ko, Patrick Ross, Corey Hart, Wolfgang Losert
arXiv:2601. 20496v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generating dense physical fields from sparse measurements is a fundamental question in sampling, signal processing, and many other applications.
By Ofek Aloni, Barak Fishbain
arXiv:2606. 12337v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) are central to computational mechanics and are commonly solved by adjoint-based optimization, while physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a flexible alternative.
By Zhen Zhang, Alessandro Alla, George Em Karniadakis
arXiv:2508. 05321v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Assume you encounter an inverse problem that shall be solved for a large number of data, but no ground-truth data is available.
By Laura Hellwege, Johann Christopher Engster, Moritz Schaar, Thorsten M. Buzug, Maik Stille
arXiv:2607. 25330v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a physics-informed neural operator (PINO) trained with pseudo-spectral frequency-domain (PSFD) equations for electromagnetic (EM) scattering problems in EUV lithography.
By Doyun Kim, Werner Gillijns
arXiv:2608. 05892v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often fail to accurately resolve partial differential equations (PDEs) with high-frequency or multi-scale solutions, as well as strongly nonlinear problems.
By Yulun Wu, Matthieu Barreau, Miguel Aguiar, Karl H. Johansson
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often fail to accurately resolve partial differential equations (PDEs) with high-frequency or multi-scale solutions, as well as strongly nonlinear problems. Two factors underlie this difficulty: spectral bias, the tendency of neural networks to underfit high-frequency features; and representation-coefficient coupling, the entanglement of representation learning and coefficient fitting within a single nonconvex optimization objective.
arXiv:2608. 15373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inverse physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can reconstruct a field accurately while returning an incorrect physical parameter.
By Yifan Zhang, Qian Tao