arXiv:2607. 17963v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ontology extension refers to the process of enriching an existing ontology in response to emerging requirements, making it more complete.
By Anna Sofia Lippolis, Mohammad Javad Saeedizade, Stefan Schmid, Simon Blattner, Robin Keskis\"arkk\"a, Aldo Gangemi, Eva Blomqvist, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese
arXiv:2608. 07700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Translating a natural-language question into a SPARQL query that can be executed against a large knowledge graph requires resolving lexical ambiguity, grounding surface terms in the target ontology, and producing graph patterns that are both syntactically valid and semantically faithful.
By Tommaso Soru, Abdulsobur Oyewale
arXiv:2607. 18029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers need to answer ad-hoc questions about the contents of domain-specific archives but often lack the expertise to write structured queries on the metadata.
By Blake G. Fitch, Cato Elia Kurtz
arXiv:2608. 16421v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents an ontology-supported approach to tackle the complexity of the Robustness Validation (RV) process of automotive electrical/electronic (E/E) components.
By Jan Novacek, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel
arXiv:2608. 06331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: From natural-language query interfaces to automated report generation, data analysis tools need a description of the data: the real-world entities it contains, which columns function as measures or identifiers, and how tables connect into units of analysis.
By Donna Hooshmand, Shubham Shahi, Cameron Barrie, Abhratanu Dutta, Marko Sterbentz, Harper Pack, Kristian J. Hammond
arXiv:2604. 26976v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study the problem of fitting a description logic (DL) ontology to a given set of positive and negative examples that take the form of an ABox and a Boolean query.
By Marvin Grosser, Carsten Lutz
arXiv:2607. 15776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: OWL ontologies provide a formal knowledge representation framework that enables semantic reasoning, and have been widely adopted across domains such as healthcare and bioinformatics.
By Hui Yang, Jiaoyan Chen, Yiping Song, Renate Schmidt, Wen Zhang
arXiv:2506. 01232v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deriving OWL ontologies from relational database schemas supports semantic interoperability and downstream tasks such as knowledge graph population, ontology-based data access, graph-based learning, and automated reasoning.
By Nadeen Fathallah, Mojtaba Nayyeri, Athish A Yogi, Ratan Bahadur Thapa, Hans-Michael Tautenhahn, Anton Schnurpel, Steffen Staab
arXiv:2507. 21438v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Ontologies and knowledge graphs require continuous evolution to remain comprehensive and accurate, but manual curation is labor intensive.
By Vishal Raman, Vijai Aravindh R, Abhijith Ragav
Ontology construction requires deciding which objects, attributes, and structural relations should be accepted as valid knowledge. Language models can propose such structures from text, but their outputs can still be unsupported or inconsistent.
arXiv:2606. 30441v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A rigorous formalization of system requirements is a fundamental prerequisite for the verification of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS).
By Marco Aruta, Francesco Improta, Vadim Malvone, Aniello Murano, Vladana Perlic
arXiv:2502. 11491v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing.
By Runxuan Liu, Bei Luo, Jiaqi Li, Baoxin Wang, Ming Liu, Dayong Wu, Shijin Wang, Bing Qin