arXiv AI

Insurance Reserve Intelligence Platform

The paper introduces an Insurance Reserve Intelligence Platform that blends a classical Thiele-equation solver with a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) enhanced by Knowledge-Informed Neural Network (KINN) losses for term-life reserve modeling. It generates synthetic policies, calculates risk-adjusted premiums, and constructs reserve-ratio datasets, then trains a neural model using seven features to predict standardized reserve ratios, achieving high accuracy (R² = 0.9887) and a 119.53× speedup over the classical solver. The framework also supports sensitivity analysis, elasticity analysis, prototype optimization, and interest-rate scenario testing, while noting remaining challenges in monotonicity and out-of-distribution generalization.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 6

Adaptive Finite-Budget Training for CVaR Risk-Aware Q-Learning

arXiv:2608. 04305v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Risk-aware Q-learning (RaQL) provides a model-free, two-timescale estimator for dynamic risk objectives, but its finite-budget behavior remains fragile: fixed inner-loop hyperparameters can produce unstable value estimates, persistent Bellman residuals, and inefficient sample reuse.

By Yifan Wu, Junjie Lei, Wenjie Huang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 4

Loss-Conditional PINNs for Parametric PDE Families

arXiv:2606. 04420v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) approximate solutions of ODEs and PDEs by minimising a weighted combination of residual, boundary, initial, and data losses.

By Anna Lazareva, Alexander Tarakanov
arXiv AI
Sep 7

Artificial Intelligence in Equity and Crypto Markets: Progress, Profitability Evidence, and the Limits of Automated Investing

Artificial Intelligence now underpins investment workflows from data and prediction to execution and tool use, yet its technical prowess does not automatically translate into profitability. A comprehensive review of public research up to 31 August 2026 across equities, ETFs, crypto spot, perpetual futures, and on‑chain markets shows real progress in prediction, text processing, portfolio design, and workflow integration, but evidence for durable net performance remains thin. The study highlights that factors such as temporal contamination, survivorship bias, weak benchmarks, implementation costs, and venue mechanics can erode alpha, and no single AI architecture has proven to deliver persistent, cross‑regime, capacity‑aware net alpha. "whyItMatters":"The findings underscore that while AI advances are evident, investors must rigorously test and govern AI systems to avoid overestimating their profitability potential."

By Linsen Zhu, Mengqing Cai
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

arXiv:2605.28853v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction cos...

By Rahul Fernandes, Travis Desell
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 23

Reliability-Aware Hard--Soft Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Robust Learning of Challenging Partial Differential Equations

arXiv:2607. 19377v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a mesh-free framework for solving partial differential equations, but their training is often affected by loss imbalance, optimization stiffness, and difficulty in capturing localized or multi-mode solution structures.

By Duc Tien Nguyen, Hang Tran, Trinh Minh Tuan, Nguyen Duc Manh, Dinh Gia Ninh
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Physics-Informed Error Field Learning: A Post-Training Optimization Framework for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Physics-Informed Error Field Learning (PIEFL) is a post‑training optimization framework for Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). After a primary network reaches satisfactory accuracy, PIEFL introduces an auxiliary error network that learns the discrepancy between the current approximation and the exact solution by deriving error control equations under physical constraints. The learned error correction is then combined with the primary prediction, improving solution accuracy without modifying the primary network architecture and focusing computational resources on correcting existing prediction errors.

By Jiuyun Sun, Yong Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 26

A tale of perfect fit and phantom optima: how data-driven models can fail in real-time optimization

The paper examines the reliability of data‑driven models for real‑time optimization (RTO) using a vinyl acetate monomer benchmark. Two models—a structured hybrid model and a fully data‑driven neural ODE—accurately reproduce plant measurements but yield economic optima that differ markedly from the plant’s true optimum, producing multiple phantom optima. The study shows that even with noise‑free data and correct initialization, stochastic gradient training can drift to weights that degrade RTO performance, indicating that predictive accuracy alone does not ensure reliable economic outcomes.

By Prithvi Dake, Rahul Bindlish, James B. Rawlings
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

Prediction-Enhanced Monte Carlo: A Machine Learning View on Control Variate

arXiv:2412. 11257v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: For many complex simulation tasks spanning areas such as healthcare, engineering, and finance, Monte Carlo (MC) methods are invaluable due to their unbiased estimates and precise error quantification.

By Fengpei Li, Haoxian Chen, Jiahe Lin, Arkin Gupta, Xiaowei Tan, Honglei Zhao, Gang Xu, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Agostino Capponi, Henry Lam